Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Dec;77(6):1042-54.
doi: 10.1037/a0017671.

A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program's effect on depressive symptoms

Steven M Brunwasser  1 , Jane E Gillham, Eric S Kim
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program's effect on depressive symptoms

Steven M Brunwasser et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to evaluate whether the Penn Resiliency Program (PRP), a group cognitive-behavioral intervention, is effective in targeting depressive symptoms in youths. We identified 17 controlled evaluations of PRP (N = 2,498) in which depressive symptoms had been measured via an online search of PsycINFO, Medline, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and by requesting data from PRP researchers. We combined effect sizes (ESs; Glass's d), using random effects models at postintervention and two follow-up assessments (6-8 and 12 months postintervention). PRP participants reported fewer depressive symptoms at postintervention and both follow-up assessments compared with youths receiving no intervention, with ESs ranging from 0.11 to 0.21. Subgroup analyses showed that PRP's effects were significant at 1 or more follow-up assessments among studies with both targeted and universal approaches, when group leaders were research team members and community providers, among participants with both low and elevated baseline symptoms, and among boys and girls. Limited data showed no evidence that PRP is superior to active control conditions. Preliminary analyses suggested that PRP's effects on depressive disorders may be smaller than those reported in a larger meta-analysis of depression prevention programs for older adolescents and adults. We found evidence that PRP significantly reduces depressive symptoms through at least 1-year postintervention. Future PRP research should examine whether PRP's effects on depressive symptoms lead to clinically meaningful benefits for its participants, whether the program is cost-effective, whether CB skills mediate program effects, and whether PRP is effective when delivered under real-world conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of studies included and excluded from the meta-analytic review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acion L, Peterson JJ, Temple S, Arndt S. Probabilistic index: An intuitive approach to measuring the size of treatment effects. Statistical Medicine. 2006;25:591–602. - PubMed
    1. Birleson P. The validity of depressive disorder in childhood and the development of a self-rating scale: A research report. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1981;22:73–88. - PubMed
    1. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review. 2006;26:17–31. - PubMed
    1. Cardemil EV. The prevention of depressive symptoms in inner-city, minority middle school students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2000) Dissertation Abstracts International. 2000;61:1627.
    1. Cardemil EV, Reivich KJ, Seligman MEP. The prevention of depressive symptoms in low-income minority middle school students. Prevention & Treatment. 2002;5 np. - PubMed

Publication types