Contour integration across spatial frequency
- PMID: 19968425
- DOI: 10.1037/a0016473
Contour integration across spatial frequency
Abstract
Association field models of contour integration suggest that local band-pass elements are spatially grouped to global contours within limited bands of spatial frequency (Field, Hayes, & Hess, 1993). While results for local orientation and spacing variation render support for AF models, effects of spatial frequency (SF) have rarely been addressed. To explore whether contour integration occurs across SF, we studied human contour detection in Gabor random fields with SF jitter along the contour, and in the embedding field. Results show no impairment of contour detection when the contour elements are 1.25 octaves apart. Even with a SF separation of 2.25 octaves there is only moderate impairment. Because SF tuning functions measured for contextual interactions of neighbored single band-pass elements indicate much smaller bandwidths (Polat & Sagi, 1993), the results imply that contour integration cannot rest solely on local locking among neighbored orientation and SF tuned mechanisms. Robustness across spatial frequency, and across color and depth, as found recently, indicates that local orientation based grouping integrates across other basic features. This suggests an origin in not too distal brain regions.
Similar articles
-
Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: empirical tests of "association field" models of contour integration.Vision Res. 2005 Sep;45(19):2511-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.002. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 15890381
-
The integration of straight contours (snakes and ladders): The role of spatial arrangement, spatial frequency and spatial phase.Vision Res. 2012 Oct 15;71:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Aug 8. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 22902640
-
The spatial frequency and orientation selectivity of the mechanisms that extract motion-defined contours.Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):568-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Sep 22. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16182334
-
Perception of contours and shapes: low and intermediate stage mechanisms.Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2106-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 27. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18502467 Review.
-
Spatial-frequency tuning of visual contour integration.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 Jun;15(6):1486-99. doi: 10.1364/josaa.15.001486. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998. PMID: 9612938 Review.
Cited by
-
Contextual Interactions in Grating Plaid Configurations Are Explained by Natural Image Statistics and Neural Modeling.Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Oct 4;10:78. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00078. eCollection 2016. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27757076 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0126449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126449. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26057620 Free PMC article.
-
Optimality of human contour integration.PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002520. Epub 2012 May 24. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012. PMID: 22654653 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources