Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;35(6):1934-49.
doi: 10.1037/a0016902.

The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition

Affiliations

The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition

Kit Ying Chan et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Clustering coefficient-a measure derived from the new science of networks-refers to the proportion of phonological neighbors of a target word that are also neighbors of each other. Consider the words bat, hat, and can, all of which are neighbors of the word cat; the words bat and hat are also neighbors of each other. In a perceptual identification task, words with a low clustering coefficient (i.e., few neighbors are neighbors of each other) were more accurately identified than words with a high clustering coefficient (i.e., many neighbors are neighbors of each other). In a lexical decision task, words with a low clustering coefficient were responded to more quickly than words with a high clustering coefficient. These findings suggest that the structure of the lexicon (i.e., the similarity relationships among neighbors of the target word measured by clustering coefficient) influences lexical access in spoken word recognition. Simulations of the TRACE and Shortlist models of spoken word recognition failed to account for the present findings. A framework for a new model of spoken word recognition is proposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A portion of the phonological network examined in Vitevitch (2008). Depicted are the word speech, phonological neighbors of speech, and the phonological neighbors of those neighbors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The left panel represents a word with a higher clustering coefficient (badge), whereas the right panel represents a word with a lower clustering coefficient (log). Note that both words have the same number of phonological neighbors.

References

    1. Albert R, Barabási AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review of Modern Physics. 2002;74:47–97.
    1. Arbesman S, Strogatz SH, Vitevitch MS. The structure of phonological networks across multiple languages. submitted. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    1. Baayen RH. Mental Lexicon Working Papers in Psycholinguistics. Vol. 1. Edmonton: 2004. Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards; pp. 1–45.
    1. Baayen RH, Tweedie FJ, Schreuder R. The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language. 2002;81:55–65. - PubMed
    1. Batagelj V, Mrvar A. Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis. Connections. 1988;21:47–57.

Publication types