Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;81(1):108-13.
doi: 10.3109/17453670903413145.

Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Warren J Clements  1 , Lisa Miller, Sarah L Whitehouse, Stephen E Graves, Philip Ryan, Ross W Crawford
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Warren J Clements et al. Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a contentious issue. The literature suggests that resurfacing of the patella is based on surgeon preference, and little is known about the role and timing of resurfacing and how this affects outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed 134,799 total knee arthroplasties using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hazards ratios (HRs) were used to compare rates of early revision between patella resurfacing at the primary procedure (the resurfacing group, R) and primary arthroplasty without resurfacing (no-resurfacing group, NR). We also analyzed the outcomes of NR that were revised for isolated patella addition.

Results: At 5 years, the R group showed a lower revision rate than the NR group: cumulative per cent revision (CPR) 3.1% and 4.0%, respectively (HR = 0.75, p < 0.001). Revisions for patellofemoral pain were more common in the NR group (17%) than in the R group (1%), and "patella only" revisions were more common in the NR group (29%) than in the R group (6%). Non-resurfaced knees revised for isolated patella addition had a higher revision rate than patella resurfacing at the primary procedure, with a 4-year CPR of 15% and 2.8%, respectively (HR = 4.1, p < 0.001).

Interpretation: Rates of early revision of primary total knees were higher when the patella was not resurfaced, and suggest that surgeons may be inclined to resurface later if there is patellofemoral pain. However, 15% of non-resurfaced knees revised for patella addition are re-revised by 4 years. Our results suggest an early beneficial outcome for patella resurfacing at primary arthroplasty based on revision rates up to 5 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative percent revision (CPR) of primary total knee arthroplasty by patella resurfacing.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative percent revision (CPR) comparing patella resurfacing at primary surgery with non-resurfacing at primary surgery revised for patella resurfacing
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aglietti P, Insall JN, Walker PS, Trent P. A new patella prosthesis. Design and application. Clin Orthop. 1975;((107)):175–87. - PubMed
    1. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001;83((9)):1376–81. - PubMed
    1. Berry DJ, Rand JA. Isolated patellar component revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;((286)):110–5. - PubMed
    1. Berti L, Benedetti MG, Ensini A, Catani F, Giannini S. Clinical and biomechanical assessment of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21((6)):610–6. - PubMed
    1. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1995;((321)):156–61. - PubMed

Publication types