Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;90(12):2081-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.014.

Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?

Affiliations

Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?

Jennifer Rengachary et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Rengachary J, d'Avossa G, Sapir A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Is the Posner Reaction Time Test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke?

Objective: To compare the accuracy of common clinical tests for left neglect with that of a computerized reaction time Posner test in a stroke population.

Design: Neglect measures were collected longitudinally in patients with stroke at the acute ( approximately 2wk) and chronic ( approximately 9mo) stages. Identical measures were collected in a healthy control group.

Setting: Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation.

Participants: Patients with acute stroke (n=59) with left neglect, 30 of whom were tested longitudinally; healthy age-matched controls (n=30).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: A receiver operating characteristic analysis ranking the measures' sensitivity and specificity using a single summary statistic.

Results: Most clinical tests were adequately accurate at the acute stage, but many were near chance at the chronic stage. The Posner test was the most sensitive test at both stages. The most sensitive variable was the reaction time difference for detecting targets appearing on the left compared with the right side.

Conclusions: Computerized reaction time tests can be used to screen for subtle but potentially clinically relevant left neglect, which may not be detectable by conventional clinical tests, especially at the chronic stage. Such tests may be useful to assess the severity of the patients' deficits and provide more accurate measures of the degree of recovery in clinical trials than established clinical measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Horizontal slices of anatomical MRI standardized in Talairach atlas showing the lesion distribution for 30 representative patients, obtained at the chronic testing session. The color scale represents the number of patients with damage in a specific voxel.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Displays the Area Under the Curve (x-axis) for each test (y-axis) for acute and chronic patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buxbaum LJ, Ferraro MK, Veramonti T, et al. Hemispatial neglect: subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology. 2004;62:749–56. - PubMed
    1. Robertson IH. Do we need the “lateral” in unilateral neglect? Spatially nonselective attention deficits in unilateral neglect and their implications for rehabilitation. NeuroImage. 2001;14:S85–90. - PubMed
    1. Ringman JM, Saver JL, Woolson RF, Clarke WR, Adams HP. Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology. 2004;63:468–74. - PubMed
    1. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Rasschou HO, Olsen TS. Hemineglect in acute stroke--incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;6:122–7. - PubMed
    1. Weintraub S, Mesulam M. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:621–5. - PubMed

Publication types