Hydrofiber dressing with silver for the management of split-thickness donor sites: a randomized evaluation of two protocols of care
- PMID: 19969423
- DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.06.193
Hydrofiber dressing with silver for the management of split-thickness donor sites: a randomized evaluation of two protocols of care
Abstract
Background: This randomized, open-label study evaluated Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing with silver (HDS; ConvaTec, Skillman, NJ, USA) with an adherent or gelled protocol in the management of split-thickness donor sites.
Methods: HDS was the primary dressing in the adherent group (gauze as secondary covering) and gelled group (transparent film as secondary covering). Dressings were changed on study day 1 or 2 and study days 5 (optional), 10 (optional), and 14. The primary outcome was healing (>or=90% re-epithelialization) at study day 14.
Results: Seventy subjects were treated (36 adherent, 34 gelled). By study day 14, 77% of donor sites had healed (67% adherent, 88% gelled). Pain scores decreased over time in both treatment groups. Investigators were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with (adherent, gelled) time required to manage dressing change (89%, 79% of subjects), minimization of donor-site pain (64%, 82%), ease of application (97%, 94%), management of drainage (92%, 82%), ease of removal (77%, 85%), and ability of dressing to remain in place (69%, 76%). Thirty-nine (56%) subjects had adverse events, most commonly non-donor-site infection (11%) and gastrointestinal events (11%).
Conclusion: In this randomized, open-label study, HDS was well-tolerated, versatile, and effective in the management of split-thickness donor sites.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00731367.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the ionic silver-containing hydrofiber and paraffin gauze dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites.Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Apr;62(4):421-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818a65e9. Ann Plast Surg. 2009. PMID: 19325350
-
A randomized comparison study of Aquacel Ag and Alginate Silver as skin graft donor site dressings.Burns. 2013 Dec;39(8):1547-50. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Aug 29. Burns. 2013. PMID: 23993403 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment.Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Aug;53(2):132-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3. Ann Plast Surg. 2004. PMID: 15269581 Clinical Trial.
-
Hydrofiber dressing and wound repair: review of the literature and new patents.Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2011 May;5(2):150-4. doi: 10.2174/187221311795399264. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2011. PMID: 21352092 Review.
-
Which dressing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites?Ann Plast Surg. 1991 Sep;27(3):288-91. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199109000-00017. Ann Plast Surg. 1991. PMID: 1952757 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical burn wound infections and their clinical implications.J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):324-33. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaffe. J Burn Care Res. 2011. PMID: 21252689 Free PMC article.
-
Skin graft donor site: a procedure for a faster healing.Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):310-314. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i3.5736. Acta Biomed. 2017. PMID: 29083336 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for postburn pruritus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 5;6(6):CD013468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013468.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38837237 Free PMC article.
-
An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):1000-1009. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12967. Epub 2018 Aug 17. Int Wound J. 2018. PMID: 30117716 Free PMC article.
-
Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate dressings.Int Wound J. 2012 Apr;9(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00867.x. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Int Wound J. 2012. PMID: 22051247 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical