Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;25(2):187-99.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gep060. Epub 2009 Dec 6.

Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation

Affiliations

Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation

Marie Z Vasquez. Mutagenesis. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Despite regulatory directives requiring the reduction of animal use in safety testing, recent modifications to genotoxicity testing guidelines now propose the use of two in vivo genotoxicity assays as a follow-up to an in vitro positive (International Conference on Harmonization Consensus Draft Guidance S2[R1] released March, 2008). To address both goals, the in vivo comet and micronucleus (MN) assays can be successfully combined into one informative study. Combining these two assays with such differences in sensitivity, endpoints measured and the type of data generated significantly improves upon the current standard capabilities for detecting genotoxicity without requiring additional animals. But to take full advantage of the benefits of incorporating the comet assay in safety testing, these same differences must be recognized and considered. Developed from over 15 years experience using the in vivo comet and MN assays in genotoxicity testing of chemicals and pharmaceuticals, this paper presents guidelines for the appropriate experimental design, dose selection and data interpretation for combined in vivo comet/MN assay studies. To illustrate the approach, data from combined assay studies are presented and discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The progression of cytotoxicity. Before cellular swelling and/or condensation are visible by gross or microscopic examination of a tissue, the earliest detectable measurements of cell death can include an increase in the percentage of individual cells with LMW DNA diffusion and/or evidence of depleted glycogen (e.g. decreased cytoplasmic pallor) in tissue sections. With the lysis of the necrotic cell membranes, more advanced LMW DNA diffusion, increased plasma enzyme levels and/or cytoplasmic eosinophilia (i.e. inflammation) in the tissue may be detected. However, the stage at which tissue necrosis/apoptosis and post-necrotic effects (e.g. compensatory hyperplasia/hypertrophy) can be detected by histopathology is too advanced to be detected by the LMW DNA diffusion assay as complete digestion and clearance of the individual dead cells has occurred.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dose-related decreases in DNA migration and LMW DNA diffusion in response to cytotoxicity of pharmaceutical tested up to the MTD. For viewing on same graph scale with LMW data, OTM values were multiplied by 3. Star indicates statistically significant increase at P < 0.05.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hormetic (∩ shaped) dose response curve of pharmaceutical tested in the comet assay. For viewing the same graph scale with LMW data, OTM values were multiplied by 3. Star indicates statistically significant increase at P < 0.05.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Possible dose response curves in the comet assay. While the common assumption is that genotoxicity is most likely to be detected at doses immediately below the MTD (- - -), the genotoxic effect as well as the confounding effects of tissue cytotoxicity (―) and even very steep dose response curves (….) can be detected in the comet assay at doses significantly lower than the MTD.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Histopathology of glycogen depletion in the liver. Haematoxylin- and eosin-stained normal liver from the vehicle control animals (a) compared to the liver with depleted glycogen from animals dosed with ≥50 mg/kg of EMS (b).

References

    1. Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, et al. Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline comet assay. Mutagenesis. 2003;18:45–51. - PubMed
    1. Burlinson B, Tice RR, Speit G, et al. Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo comet assay workgroup. Mutat. Res. 2007;627:31–35. - PubMed
    1. Vasquez MZ. Cytotoxicity and its impact on the in vivo comet assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2007;48:624.
    1. Dewhurst NE, Vasquez MZ. Interpreting data from in vitro genotoxicity tests using the acellular comet assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2008;7:576.
    1. EMEA. ICH Topic S2A Genotoxicity: Note for Guidance on Genotoxicity: specific Aspects of Regulatory Genotoxicity Tests for Pharmaceuticals. 2006. (CPMP/ICH/141/95). EMEA, London, UK.

Publication types