The present attitude toward the biology and technology of limb lengthening
- PMID: 1997254
The present attitude toward the biology and technology of limb lengthening
Abstract
Over the past ten years, many technical innovations and biologic concepts have appeared as they relate to the lengthening of long bones. Each of these has had a substantial influence upon the approach to the treatment of major discrepancies in limb length and angular deformities. It is the purpose of this paper to present these issues as objectively as possible so that the reader can put them into proper perspective, recognizing that there will be some degree of bias in the implementation of some of the technical devices. To appreciate the utility of these techniques, it is necessary to understand the biologic foundation of each method as well as its advantages and disadvantages.
Similar articles
-
Leg lengthening. A review of 30 years.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Oct;(247):38-43. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. PMID: 2676302 Review.
-
Advances in management of limb length discrepancy and lower limb deformity.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f35eeb. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008. PMID: 18197038 Review.
-
[Leg lengthening using callotasis. I. History of lengthening of extremities and surgical technics].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1993;60(2):67-75. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1993. PMID: 8342378 Czech.
-
Management of pediatric limb length inequality.Adv Pediatr. 1995;42:501-43. Adv Pediatr. 1995. PMID: 8540437 Review.
-
Results of femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov technique.J Pediatr Orthop. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):224-31. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7745099
Cited by
-
Complications of bone lengthening.Int Orthop. 1994 Oct;18(5):299-303. doi: 10.1007/BF00180230. Int Orthop. 1994. PMID: 7852010
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous