Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study
- PMID: 1999126
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02090159
Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study
Abstract
A prospective, manometric study has been performed on 23 female patients with rectal prolapse and varying degrees of incontinence. Seven of the 14 incontinent patients regained continence after surgery, and a further two patients improved. Improvement in internal and external sphincter function follows correction of rectal prolapse. Preoperative resting anal pressure was significantly higher in continent patients than in incontinent patients (P less than 0.05), as was the maximum voluntary contraction pressure (P less than 0.027). Postoperatively there was a significant increase in the resting anal pressure (P less than 0.0001) and maximum voluntary contraction pressure (P less than 0.003) in the whole group. The preoperative resting anorectal angle was significantly more acute (P less than 0.028) in continent patients than in incontinent patients. There was no significant change in the resting anorectal angle following prolapse repair. Patients who remained incontinent had a significantly lower preoperative resting anal pressure (P less than 0.01) than patients who improved or regained continence. Similarly, maximum voluntary contraction pressure was lower preoperatively in these patients (P less than 0.02). Preoperative resting anal pressure below 10 mm Hg and maximum voluntary contraction pressure below 50 mm Hg are associated with persisting incontinence after surgery.
Similar articles
-
[Abdominal rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: how to foresee the functional result].Ann Ital Chir. 1994 Mar-Apr;65(2):183-7. Ann Ital Chir. 1994. PMID: 7978760 Italian.
-
[Fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Clinico-functional assessment].Minerva Chir. 1995 Sep;50(9):741-5. Minerva Chir. 1995. PMID: 8587707 Italian.
-
Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988 Mar;3(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01649678. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988. PMID: 3361220
-
Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment.Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):262-82. Dan Med Bull. 2003. PMID: 13677243 Review.
-
Rectal prolapse.Curr Probl Surg. 1986 Jun;23(6):397-451. doi: 10.1016/0011-3840(86)90011-0. Curr Probl Surg. 1986. PMID: 3522112 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Anorectal Physiology Testing for Prolapse-What Tests are Necessary?Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714246. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021. PMID: 33536845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical management of combined rectal and genital prolapse in young patients: transabdominal approach.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Mar;20(2):173-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0647-8. Epub 2004 Oct 13. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005. PMID: 15490197
-
Rectal prolapse.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007 May;20(2):125-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-977491. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007. PMID: 20011387 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Aug;12(8):1446-51. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0531-x. Epub 2008 May 31. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008. PMID: 18516652
-
A new technique for suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse.Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Mar;13(1):27-31; discussion 32-3. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0455-9. Epub 2009 Mar 14. Tech Coloproctol. 2009. PMID: 19288248
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical