The future of peritoneal dialysis in the United States: optimizing its use
- PMID: 19995996
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04760709
The future of peritoneal dialysis in the United States: optimizing its use
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been used to treat patients with stage V chronic kidney disease since 1976. However, despite this long history, as of 2008 <8% of prevalent ESRD patients in the United States are treated with PD, a modality mix that is significantly different from what is seen in other developed countries. Data are reviewed that suggest that the reasons for this seem to be caused by non-medical-related issues such as subtle differences in practice patterns and unintended financial considerations. Medical outcome date would seem to favor more utilization of PD. For instance, data from the USRDS suggested that the relative risk of death for PD versus center hemodialysis has been improving, tending to favor those on PD for longer and longer periods of time. Infectious complications have also been markedly reduced. It is anticipated that changes in government reimbursement, such as the bundling of dialysis-related services, will stimulate a renewed interest in home therapies. Currently most home dialysis units are small, and some have minimal clinical experience with PD. If trends in reimbursement do favor a renewed interest in PD, for patient outcomes on PD to continue to improve, there will likely need to be further educational activities focused on PD, and perhaps, consolidation of PD programs may needed.
Similar articles
-
The financial implications for Medicare of greater use of peritoneal dialysis.Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.004. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19446160
-
Making peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis more economically viable.Nephrol News Issues. 2006 Jul;20(8):54, 56-8. Nephrol News Issues. 2006. PMID: 16859233 No abstract available.
-
Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies.Semin Nephrol. 2009 Sep;29(5):524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2009.06.009. Semin Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19751898 Review.
-
[Comparison of clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005;117 Suppl 6:60-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0494-9. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005. PMID: 16437335 German.
-
Role of peritoneal dialysis in the era of the resurgence of home hemodialysis.Hemodial Int. 2008 Jul;12 Suppl 1:S51-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00297.x. Hemodial Int. 2008. PMID: 18638242 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement Using an Optimal Placement Technique.JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1):e2020.00115. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00115. JSLS. 2021. PMID: 33879992 Free PMC article.
-
Health policies on dialysis modality selection: a nationwide population cohort study.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e013007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013007. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28077410 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the incidence, demographics, and outcomes of end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis in the US from 1995 to 2006.Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jun;63(6):1681-8. doi: 10.1002/art.30293. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. PMID: 21445962 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life, clinical outcome, personality and coping in chronic hemodialysis patients.Ren Fail. 2017 Nov;39(1):45-53. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1244077. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Ren Fail. 2017. PMID: 27778533 Free PMC article.
-
Peritoneal dialysis in older adults: Evaluation of clinical, nutritional, metabolic outcomes, and quality of life.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11953. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011953. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30170391 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical