Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;163(12):1080-6.
doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.229.

Safety and transparency of pediatric drug trials

Affiliations

Safety and transparency of pediatric drug trials

Daniel K Benjamin Jr et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the frequency and type of new safety information arising from studies performed under the auspices of the Pediatric Exclusivity Program, to describe the dissemination of these findings in the peer-reviewed literature and compare this with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review, and to describe their effect on pediatric labeling.

Design: Cohort study of the 365 trials performed for 153 drugs.

Setting: The Pediatric Exclusivity incentive from December 1997 through September 2007.

Participants: Food and Drug Administration publicly available records and peer-reviewed literature retrievable by MEDLINE search. Main Exposures New safety findings obtained from the trials completed for exclusivity.

Outcome measures: Concordance of the information highlighted in the peer-reviewed article abstracts with the information in the FDA labeling and drug reviews.

Results: There were 137 labeling changes; we evaluated 129 of these (the 8 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were excluded from review). Thirty-three products (26%) had pediatric safety information added to the labeling. Of these, 12 products had neuropsychiatric safety findings and 21 had other important safety findings. Only 16 of 33 of these trials (48%) were reported in the peer-reviewed literature; however, 7 of 16 focused on findings substantively different from those highlighted in the FDA reviews and labeling changes.

Conclusions: Medication adverse events in children often differ from those in adults, particularly those that are neuropsychiatric in nature. Labeling changes for pediatric use demonstrate that pediatric drug studies provide valuable and unique safety data that can guide the use of these drugs in children. Unfortunately, most of these articles are not published, and almost half of the published articles focus their attention away from the crucial safety data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Products studied for Pediatric Exclusivity and subsequent disposition. FDA = Food and Drug Administration; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gilman JT, Gal P. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data collection in children and neonates. A quiet frontier. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992;23:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JT. An update on the therapeutic orphan. Pediatrics. 1999;104(3 Pt 2):585–590. - PubMed
    1. Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs: revision of “pediatric use” subsection in the labeling. Federal Regist. 1994;59:64240. 21 CFR Part 201.
    1. Regulations requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients. Federal Regist. 1998;63:66632–66672. 21 CFR Parts 201, 312, 314, and 601. - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. 1997. Pub L No. 105–115, 111 Stat 2296.

Publication types

Substances