Morbidity and mortality in 1022 consecutive living donor nephrectomies: benefits of a living donor registry
- PMID: 19996926
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181bb44fd
Morbidity and mortality in 1022 consecutive living donor nephrectomies: benefits of a living donor registry
Abstract
Background: We assessed postoperative complication rates in living donor nephrectomies (LDN) during the last decade (1997-2008).
Methods: Postoperative complications were classified by the Clavien grading system. We defined Clavien grade more than or equal to 3 as major complications. A total of 1022 LDNs performed during the period 1997-2008 were included.
Results: Median age at donation was 47.7 years (range 18.4-78.9), and mean body mass index was 25.4 (SD 3.2). There was no peri- or postoperative mortality. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in 244 (23.9%) donors. Three of these needed surgical conversion. A total of 30 major (2.9%) and 184 (18%) minor complications were registered. There was a higher frequency of major complications in the laparoscopic group (4.1% vs. 2.6%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-three donors underwent early re-operations. Wound infection developed in 3.7% of donors. Increased risk was associated with body mass index more than 25 (OR 4.03; 95% CI 1.80, 9.04) and smoking (OR 4.38; 95% CI 2.30, 9.96). Significant perioperative bleeding occurred in 1.6%. There were seven cases of renal artery laceration. Increased risk for a combined endpoint of intraoperative incidents, major complications and significant bleeding were seen in relation to laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.33, 5.19).
Conclusion: The risk of major complications related to LDN is low, but do represent a potential hazard to the donor. The special nature of LDN and the constantly evolving operative technique requires vigilant surveillance, by the use of national or supranational registries/databases.
Similar articles
-
Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies--is it time to use a standardized classification of complications?J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 29. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20303114
-
More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.Arch Surg. 2005 Sep;140(9):835-9; discussion 839-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.835. Arch Surg. 2005. PMID: 16172291
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1132-5. Am Surg. 2000. PMID: 11149584
-
Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17868736 Review.
-
Living donor nephrectomy--quantifying the risk for the donor.Transplant Proc. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(6):1786-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.06.006. Transplant Proc. 2012. PMID: 22841273 Review.
Cited by
-
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.Transplantation. 2017 Aug;101(8S Suppl 1):S1-S109. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001769. Transplantation. 2017. PMID: 28742762 Free PMC article.
-
Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1678-86. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01040115. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26268509 Free PMC article.
-
A machine-learning approach to estimating public intentions to become a living kidney donor in England: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional survey data.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1052338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1052338. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36684997 Free PMC article.
-
Living Anonymous Renal Donors Do Not Regret: Intermediate and Long-Term Follow-Up with a Focus on Motives and Psychosocial Outcomes.Ann Transplant. 2019 Apr 26;24:234-241. doi: 10.12659/AOT.913827. Ann Transplant. 2019. PMID: 31023996 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting donor, recipient and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation to inform pretransplant counselling: the donor and recipient linked iPREDICTLIVING tool - a retrospective study.Transpl Int. 2020 Jul;33(7):729-739. doi: 10.1111/tri.13580. Epub 2020 Feb 24. Transpl Int. 2020. PMID: 31970822 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical