Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009:2009:546390.
doi: 10.1155/2009/546390. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles

Hiroo Imazu  1 , Yujiro Uchiyama, Hiroshi Kakutani, Kei-Ichi Ikeda, Kazuki Sumiyama, Mitsuru Kaise, Salem Omar, Tiing Leong Ang, Hisao Tajiri
Affiliations

A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles

Hiroo Imazu et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009.

Abstract

Background and aims: There are limited data on the differences in diagnostic yield between 25-gauge and 22-gauge EUS-FNA needles. This prospective study compared the difference in diagnostic yield between a 22-gauge and a 25-gauge needle when performing EUS-FNA.

Methods: Forty-three patients with intraluminal or extraluminal mass lesions and/or lymphadenopathy were enrolled prospectively. EUS-FNA was performed for each mass lesion using both 25- and 22-gauge needles. The differences in accuracy rate, scoring of needle visibility, ease of puncture and quantity of obtained specimen were evaluated.

Results: The overall accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needle was similar at 81% and 76% respectively (N.S). Likewise the visibility scores of both needles were also similar. Overall the quantity of specimen obtained higher with the 22-gauge needle (score: 1.64 vs. P < .001). However the 25-gauge needle was significantly superior to the 22-gauge needle in terms of ease of puncture (score: 1.9 vs. 1.29, P < .001) and in the quantity of specimen in the context of pancreatic mass EUS-FNA (score: 1.8 vs. 1.58, P < .05).

Conclusion: The 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles have similar overall diagnostic yield. The 25-gauge needle appeared superior in the subset of patients with hard lesions and pancreatic masses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EUS-FNA images for pancreatic head cancer using (a) 22-gauge and (b) 25-gauge needles. The tip of the 22-gauge needle was bent within the lesion during the puncture, and no material was obtained. The arrow indicates the bent tip of the 22-gauge needle. The 25-gauge needle tip remained straight during the EUS-FNA procedure (arrow), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed with EUS-FNA using the 25-gauge needle.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Chang KJ, Katz KD, Durbin TE, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1994;40(6):694–699. - PubMed
    1. Vilmann P, Hancke S, Henriksen FW, Jacobsen GK. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1995;41(3):230–235. - PubMed
    1. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut. 1999;44(5):720–726. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin HJ, Lahoti S, Sneige N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. Cancer. 2002;96(3):174–180. - PubMed
    1. Bentz JS, Kochman ML, Faigel DO, Ginsberg GG, Smith DB, Gupta PK. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration: clinicopathologic features of 60 patients. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 1998;18(2):98–109. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources