Benefit of baseline cytometry for surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus
- PMID: 19997751
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0741-7
Benefit of baseline cytometry for surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus
Abstract
Background: The current gold standard for the surveillance of Barrett's esophagus is the Seattle four-quadrant biopsies protocol (4-QB). Using endoscopic brush cytology, this study prospectively investigated whether digital image cytometry (DICM) is of additional benefit over regular histology as a predictor for progression to high-grade dysplasia or cancer during a surveillance of at least 3 years.
Methods: The prospective cohort in this study included 93 patients (72% male) with Barrett's esophagus, baseline endoscopies, and at least one DICM in addition to 4-QB who had been followed up a minimum of 3 years at the time of analysis. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma were defined as primary end points. The DICM was performed on Feulgen-restained cytology smears with a continuous collision detection (CCD) three-chip color video camera (Sony) and an AutoCyte QUIC DNA workstation.
Results: Of the 93 patients, 11 presented with the diagnosis of HGD and adenocarcinoma at baseline endoscopy. The remaining 82 patients were analyzed after a median follow-up time of 44 months (range, 36-65 months). Of these 82 patients, 9 (11%) had low-grade dysplasia (LGD) at baseline histology: One of two patients with LGD and aneuploid DICM showed HGD at follow-up assessment, whereas none of seven patients with LGD and diploid DICM had development of HGD. Of the 82 patients, 73 (89%) had either specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) without dyplasia or indefinite findings for dysplasia at baseline histology. Of the eight patients with SIM and intermediate/aneuploid DICM, two had development of HGD. None of those with negative or indefinite findings for dysplasia and diploid DICM had HGD at the follow-up evaluation. In summary, the three patients who had development of HGD showed a pathologic DICM at baseline, and no patient with diploid DICM had HGD.
Conclusions: Cytometry from brush cytology as an add-on to histology appears to be of additional benefit during surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. Whereas an aneuploid/intermediate DICM warrants an early re-endoscopy, a diploid DICM underscores the low-risk status especially of patients with low-grade dysplasia.
Similar articles
-
Is there an advantage to be gained from adding digital image cytometry of brush cytology to a standard biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett's esophagus?Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):409-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214641. Epub 2009 May 5. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19418394 Clinical Trial.
-
Dysplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus: a prospective 3-year follow-up.Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Nov;92(11):2012-6. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997. PMID: 9362182
-
Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus indefinite for dysplasia.Dis Esophagus. 2017 Mar 1;30(3):1-5. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow025. Dis Esophagus. 2017. PMID: 28184470 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association.Gastroenterology. 2016 Nov;151(5):822-835. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.040. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 27702561 Review.
-
Progression from low-grade dysplasia to malignancy in patients with Barrett's esophagus diagnosed by two or more pathologists.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 21;22(39):8831-8843. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8831. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27818599 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May;13(5):291-304. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.208. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26598944 Review.
-
Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e31-e50. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.032. Epub 2021 Apr 23. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33901662 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):599-607.e7; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.040. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26619962 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec 7;16(45):5669-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5669. World J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 21128316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma: Do We Have Suitable Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers?Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:643084. doi: 10.1155/2013/643084. Epub 2013 Mar 20. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013. PMID: 23573078 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources