Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;27(2):81-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-009-9453-0. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

High-density biatrial pacing protects against atrial fibrillation by synchronizing left atrial tissue

Affiliations

High-density biatrial pacing protects against atrial fibrillation by synchronizing left atrial tissue

James C Hansen et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The induction and sustainability of atrial fibrillation (AF) are most commonly due to pulmonary vein (PV) triggers and left atrial (LA) substrate. We hypothesized that simultaneous pacing of the PV ostia, LA, and right atrium (RA) reduces AF susceptibility by synchronizing atrial activity.

Methods: Mongrel dogs were rapidly paced and maintained in AF for 3 months before cardioversion. Pacing leads were then placed at PV ostia, LA, and RA sites. For single-site pacing (SSP), a drive train (S1) and premature stimulus (S2) were delivered from the same electrode. Multisite pacing (MSP) consisted of S1 at all leads simultaneously and S2 at one site. Pacing trials were performed with decremental S2 coupling intervals (CI) to endpoints of AF induction or refractoriness.

Results: AF induction was reduced by 40.0% with MSP vs. SSP (7.2% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.001). LA S2 sites were more likely to induce AF than RA sites (11.5% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.0001), with benefit of MSP over SSP at LA sites (8.6% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.0001). The CI for AF induction was longer with SSP vs. MSP (119.4 +/- 13.3 vs. 104.4 +/- 11.2 ms, p < 0.05). Atrial activation times were shortened with MSP vs. SSP (87.4 +/- 4.9 vs. 97.1 +/- 10 ms, p < 0.005).

Conclusions: Atrial synchronization was shown by the decreased activation times with MSP. AF induction was reduced by 40.0% with MSP, supporting the hypothesis of decreased AF susceptibility with synchronization. This is the first study demonstrating AF protection with high-density pacing at LA sites associated with triggers and substrate for the induction and maintenance of AF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Circulation. 2000 Sep 19;102(12):1454-60 - PubMed
    1. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jun;5(6):839-45 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Mar;25(3):342-50 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Sep 18;40(6):1140-50; discussion 1151-2 - PubMed
    1. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008 Apr;1(1):6-13 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources