Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing
- PMID: 19998099
- PMCID: PMC2792120
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160902928209
Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing
Erratum in
- Am J Bioeth. 2009 Aug;9(8):77
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores social networkers' interest in and attitudes toward personal genome testing (PGT), focusing on expectations related to the clinical integration of PGT results.
Methods: An online survey of 1,087 social networking users was conducted to assess 1) use and interest in PGT; 2) attitudes toward PGT companies and test results; and 3) expectations for the clinical integration of PGT. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize respondents' characteristics and responses.
Results: Six percent of respondents have used PGT, 64% would consider using PGT, and 30% would not use PGT. Of those who would consider using PGT, 74% report they would use it to gain knowledge about disease in their family. 34% of all respondents consider the information obtained from PGT to be a medical diagnosis. 78% of those who would consider PGT would ask their physician for help interpreting test results, and 61% of all respondents believe physicians have a professional obligation to help individuals interpret PGT results.
Conclusion: Respondents express interest in using PGT services, primarily for purposes related to their medical care and expect physicians to help interpret PGT results. Physicians should therefore be prepared for patient demands for information and counsel on the basis of PGT results.
Comment in
-
Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):11-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894005. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998102 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance--it is market failure.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):13-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874411. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998103 No abstract available.
-
Social networking and personal genomics: suggestions for optimizing the interaction.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):15-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894039. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998104 No abstract available.
-
Genethics 2.0: phenotypes, genotypes, and the challenge of databases generated by personal genome testing.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893890. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998105 No abstract available.
-
Are social networkers and genome testers one in the same? The limitations of public opinion research for guiding clinical practice.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):21-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893908. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998106 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
How attitudes research contributes to overoptimistic expectations of personal genome testing.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):23-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874429. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998107 No abstract available.
-
Apomediation and the significance of online social networking.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893981. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998108 No abstract available.
-
Personal genomics as an interactive web broadcast.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):27-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874395. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998109 No abstract available.
-
We are the genes we've been waiting for: rational responses to the gathering storm of personal genomics.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893999. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998110 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Challenges in the use of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing in children.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893916. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998111 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):11-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894005. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998102 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance--it is market failure.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):13-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874411. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998103 No abstract available.
-
Apomediation and the significance of online social networking.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893981. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998108 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA.Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):220-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x. Intern Med J. 2010. PMID: 20446967 Review.
-
[Direct-to-consumer genetic testing through Internet: marketing, ethical and social issues].Med Sci (Paris). 2011 Jan;27(1):95-102. doi: 10.1051/medsci/201127195. Med Sci (Paris). 2011. PMID: 21299969 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.J Community Genet. 2011 Sep;2(3):135-46. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0048-y. Epub 2011 May 28. J Community Genet. 2011. PMID: 22109820 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in attitudes toward genetic testing among the public, patients, and health-care professionals in Korea.Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Oct;26(10):1432-1440. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0191-6. Epub 2018 Jun 18. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018. PMID: 29915183 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates.J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:309109. doi: 10.1155/2012/309109. Epub 2012 Jul 30. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22899921 Free PMC article.
-
Translational Genomic Research: Protocol Development and Initial Outcomes following SNP Testing for Colon Cancer Risk.Transl Behav Med. 2013 Mar 1;3(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0149-0. Epub 2012 Jun 10. Transl Behav Med. 2013. PMID: 23565131 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Community Genet. 2018 Jan;9(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0310-z. Epub 2017 Jun 29. J Community Genet. 2018. PMID: 28664264 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Demographics of Internet Users. [accessed July 7, 2008]. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/User_Demo_2.15.08.htm.
-
- Rapleaf Study of Social Networking Users Vs. Age. [accessed July 7, 2008]. Available at: http://business.rapleaf.com/company_press_2008_06_18.html.
-
- 23andMe. 2007. [press release November 19, 2007]. Available at https://www.23andme.com/about/press (accessed)
-
- 23andMe. 23andMe. 2009. [accessed April 10, 2009]. Available at: https://www.23andme.com/
-
- American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors and the American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. ASHG/ACMG report points to consider: Ethical, legal and psychological implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1995;57:1233–1241. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical