Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics
- PMID: 19998112
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160902874452
Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics
Abstract
The convergence of increasingly efficient high throughput sequencing technology and ubiquitous Internet use by the public has fueled the proliferation of companies that provide personal genetic information (PGI) direct-to-consumers. Companies such as 23andme (Mountain View, CA) and Navigenics (Foster City, CA) are emblematic of a growing market for PGI that some argue represents a paradigm shift in how the public values this information and incorporates it into how they behave and plan for their futures. This new class of social networking business ventures that market the science of the personal genome illustrates the new trend in collaborative science. In addition to fostering a consumer empowerment movement, it promotes the trend of democratizing information--openly sharing of data with all interested parties, not just the biomedical researcher--for the purposes of pooling data (increasing statistical power) and escalating the innovation process. This target article discusses the need for new approaches to studying DTC genomics using social network analysis to identify the impact of obtaining, sharing, and using PGI. As a locus of biosociality, DTC personal genomics forges social relationships based on beliefs of common genetic susceptibility that links risk, disease, and group identity. Ethical issues related to the reframing of DTC personal genomic consumers as advocates and research subjects and the creation of new social formations around health research may be identified through social network analysis.
Comment in
-
Response to open peer commentaries on "Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer personal genomics".Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902967009. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998097 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):45-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893924. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998113 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Personal genomics: democratization, or empowerment, or 'something'.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894013. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998114 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160902918770. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998115 No abstract available.
-
Networking genetics, populations, and race.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):50-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893957. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998116 No abstract available.
-
Genetic privacy: might there be a moral duty to share one's genetic information?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):52-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160902923440. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998117 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genome-wide scans: astrologicogenomics or simple scams?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894021. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998118 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):56-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893965. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998119 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Response to open peer commentaries on "Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer personal genomics".Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902967009. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998097 No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality.Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):45-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893924. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998113 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario?Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160902918770. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998115 No abstract available.
-
Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research.Account Res. 2011 May;18(3):132-47. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575032. Account Res. 2011. PMID: 21574070 Review.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA.Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):220-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x. Intern Med J. 2010. PMID: 20446967 Review.
Cited by
-
Information and Communication Technologies, Genes, and Peer-Production of Knowledge to Empower Citizens' Health.Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Jun;24(3):871-885. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9686-5. Epub 2015 Nov 7. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018. PMID: 26547555
-
How the electronic health record will change the future of health care.Yale J Biol Med. 2012 Sep;85(3):379-86. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Yale J Biol Med. 2012. PMID: 23012585 Free PMC article.
-
Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Nov;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1-21. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.219. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013. PMID: 24225486 Free PMC article.
-
Only connect: personal genomics and the future of American medicine.Mol Diagn Ther. 2010 Apr 1;14(2):67-72. doi: 10.2165/11534710-000000000-00000. Mol Diagn Ther. 2010. PMID: 20359249 Free PMC article.
-
Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 5;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0292-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29871685 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials