This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2009;9(6-7):56-8.

doi: 10.1080/15265160902893965.

Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?

Katherine Wasson¹

Affiliations

Affiliation

¹ Loyola University Chicago, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 S 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. kawasson@lumc.edu

PMID: 19998119
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902893965

Comment

Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?

Katherine Wasson. Am J Bioeth. 2009.

. 2009;9(6-7):56-8.

doi: 10.1080/15265160902893965.

Author

Katherine Wasson¹

Affiliation

¹ Loyola University Chicago, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 S 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. kawasson@lumc.edu

PMID: 19998119
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902893965

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics.
Lee SS, Crawley L. Lee SS, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):35-44. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874452. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998112

Similar articles

Response to open peer commentaries on "Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer personal genomics".
Lee SS, Crawley L. Lee SS, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902967009. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998097 No abstract available.
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance--it is market failure.
Jordens CF, Kerridge IH, Samuel GN. Jordens CF, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):13-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874411. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998103 No abstract available.
Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario?
Caulfield T. Caulfield T. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160902918770. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998115 No abstract available.
Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
Wallace SE, Gourna EG, Nikolova V, Sheehan NA. Wallace SE, et al. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 9;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0080-2. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26645273 Free PMC article. Review.
Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research.
Prainsack B. Prainsack B. Account Res. 2011 May;18(3):132-47. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575032. Account Res. 2011. PMID: 21574070 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
Brett GR, Metcalfe SA, Amor DJ, Halliday JL. Brett GR, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;20(8):825-30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.13. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012. PMID: 22317975 Free PMC article.
openSNP--a crowdsourced web resource for personal genomics.
Greshake B, Bayer PE, Rausch H, Reda J. Greshake B, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 19;9(3):e89204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089204. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24647222 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information