This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2009;9(6-7):68-9.

doi: 10.1080/15265160902918663.

Answering the 'so what?' question for empirical research in bioethics

Matthew K Wynia¹

Affiliations

PMID: 19998122
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902918663

Comment

Answering the 'so what?' question for empirical research in bioethics

Matthew K Wynia. Am J Bioeth. 2009.

. 2009;9(6-7):68-9.

doi: 10.1080/15265160902918663.

Author

Matthew K Wynia¹

Affiliation

¹ Institute for Ethics, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL 60610, USA. Matthew.Wynia@ama-assn.org

PMID: 19998122
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902918663

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

The role of empirical research in bioethics.
Kon AA. Kon AA. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):59-65. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874320. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998120 Free PMC article.

Similar articles

How to build a theory about empirical bioethics: acknowledging the limitations of empirical research.
Fry CL. Fry CL. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):83-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903162709. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998131 No abstract available.
What empirical research can do for bioethics.
Hoffmaster B, Hooker C. Hoffmaster B, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):72-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893940. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998125 No abstract available.
Empirical bioethics: present and future possibilities.
Shelton W. Shelton W. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):74-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893973. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998126 No abstract available.
Shifting paradigms in bioethics and health law: the rise of a new pragmatism.
Wolf SM. Wolf SM. Am J Law Med. 1994;20(4):395-415. Am J Law Med. 1994. PMID: 7618636 Review. No abstract available.
Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: it's all relative.
Ives J, Draper H. Ives J, et al. Bioethics. 2009 May;23(4):249-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01715.x. Bioethics. 2009. PMID: 19338525 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Evidence-based research ethics.
Kalichman M. Kalichman M. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):85-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160902923457. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998132 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
The risk of normative bias in reporting empirical research: lessons learned from prenatal screening studies about the prominence of acknowledged limitations.
Nakou P, Bennett R. Nakou P, et al. Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Dec;44(6):589-606. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Theor Med Bioeth. 2023. PMID: 37930620 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Atypon