Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;27(Pt 2):297-310.
doi: 10.1348/026151008x299728.

From fancy to reason: scaling deaf and hearing children's understanding of theory of mind and pretence

Affiliations

From fancy to reason: scaling deaf and hearing children's understanding of theory of mind and pretence

Candida C Peterson et al. Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

We examined deaf and hearing children's progression of steps in theory of mind (ToM) development including their understanding of social pretending. Ninety-three children (33 deaf; 60 hearing) aged 3-13 years were tested on a set of six closely matched ToM tasks. Results showed that deaf children were delayed substantially behind hearing children in understanding pretending, false belief (FB) and other ToM concepts, in line with their delayed uptake of social pretend (SP) play. By using a scaling methodology, we confirmed previous evidence of a consistent five-step developmental progression for both groups. Moreover, by including social pretence understanding, both deaf and hearing children's ToM sequences were shown to extend reliably to six sequential developmental steps. Finally and focally, even though both groups' sequences were six steps long, the placement of pretence relative to other ToM milestones varied with hearing status. Deaf children understood social pretending at an earlier step in the ToM sequence than hearing children, albeit at a later chronological age. Theoretically, the findings are relevant to questions about how universal developmental progressions come together along with culturally distinctive inputs and biological factors (such as hearing loss) to set the pace for ToM development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Astington JW. Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In: Repacholi B, Slaughter V, editors. Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development. Hove, U.K: Psychology Press; 2003. pp. 13–38.
    1. Astington JW, Jenkins JM. Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition and Emotion. 1995;9:151–165.
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition. 1985;21:37–46. - PubMed
    1. Brown JR, Donelan-McCall N, Dunn J. Why talk about mental states? The significance of children’s conversations with friends, siblings and mothers. Child Development. 1996;67:836–849. - PubMed
    1. Brown PM, Prescott SJ, Rickards FW, Paterson MM. Communicating about pretend play: A comparison of the utterances of four-year-old normally hearing and hearing-impaired children in an integrated kindergarten. Volta Review. 1997;99:5–17.