Similar articles

• Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.

  Mijiritsky E, Mardinger O, Mazor Z, Chaushu G. Mijiritsky E, et al. Implant Dent. 2009 Aug;18(4):326-33. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31819ecaaa. Implant Dent. 2009. PMID: 19667821
• Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites.

  Chen ST, Buser D. Chen ST, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885446 Review.
• Spiral family implants inserted in postextraction bone sites.

  Danza M, Guidi R, Carinci F. Danza M, et al. Implant Dent. 2009 Jun;18(3):270-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181a4584c. Implant Dent. 2009. PMID: 19509537
• A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration.

  Hassan KS, Kassim A, Al Ogaly AU. Hassan KS, et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Nov;106(5):e8-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Sep 20. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. PMID: 18805718 Clinical Trial.
• Single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla by means of immediate implantation and provisionalization: a review.

  De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. De Rouck T, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):897-904. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008. PMID: 19014160 Review.