Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;11(2):248-56.
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00740.x. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Age and sex trends in long-term opioid use in two large American health systems between 2000 and 2005

Affiliations

Age and sex trends in long-term opioid use in two large American health systems between 2000 and 2005

Stephen M Thielke et al. Pain Med. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate recent age- and sex-specific changes in long-term opioid prescription among patients with chronic pain in two large American Health Systems.

Design: Analysis of administrative pharmacy data to calculate changes in prevalence of long-term opioid prescription (90 days or more during a calendar year) from 2000 to 2005, within groups based on sex and age (18-44, 45-64, and 65 years and older). Separate analyses were conducted for patients with and without a diagnosis of a mood disorder or anxiety disorder. Changes in mean dose between 2000 and 2005 were estimated, as were changes in the rate of prescription for different opioid types (short-acting, long-acting, and non-Schedule 2).

Patients: Enrollees in HealthCore (N = 2,716,163 in 2000) and Arkansas Medicaid (N = 115,914 in 2000).

Results: Within each of the age and sex groups, less than 10% of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis in HealthCore, and less than 33% in Arkansas Medicaid, received long-term opioid prescriptions. All age, sex, and anxiety/depression groups showed similar and statistically significant increases in long-term opioid prescription between 2000 and 2005 (35-50% increase). Per-patient daily doses did not increase.

Conclusions: No one group showed especially large increases in long-term opioid prescriptions between 2000 and 2005. These results argue against a recent epidemic of opioid prescribing. These trends may result from increased attention to pain in clinical settings, policy or economic changes, or provider and patient openness to opioid therapy. The risks and benefits to patients of these changes are not yet established.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage change in prevalence of long-term opioid use among patients with one or more tracer chronic pain diagnoses from 2000 to 2005, by age and sex group, in Health-Core and Arkansas Medicaid. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Olsen Y, Daumit GL, Ford DE. Opioid prescriptions by U.S. primary care physicians from 1992 to 2001. J Pain. 2006;7(4):225–35. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Fan MY, et al. Trends in use of opioids for non-cancer pain conditions 2000–2005 in Commercial and Medicaid insurance plans: The TROUP study. Pain. 2008;138(2):440–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zerzan JT, Morden NE, Soumerai S, et al. Trends and geographic variation of opiate medication use in state Medicaid fee-for-service programs, 1996 to 2002. Med Care. 2006;44(11):1005–10. - PubMed
    1. Bell JR. Australian trends in opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain, 1986–1996. Med J Aust. 1997;167(1):26–9. - PubMed
    1. Clausen TG. International opioid consumption. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(1 Pt 2):162–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances