Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;38(2):171-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00515.x. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

Impact of social and economic characteristics on orthodontic treatment among children and teenagers in France

Affiliations

Impact of social and economic characteristics on orthodontic treatment among children and teenagers in France

A Germa et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of orthodontic treatment in France among children and teenagers aged 8-18 years, by sex and by age, and to investigate the specific role of social and economic characteristics on use of orthodontic treatment.

Methods: We analyzed data from the cross-sectional national health survey conducted in France in 2002-2003, which included a sample of 5988 children aged 8-18 years. All data were collected by interview including the question on orthodontic treatment. Other data used in our study were family social status and income, maternal educational attainment and place of birth, whether the child was covered by a supplementary health insurance and whether the residence was urban or rural. We also calculated the density of orthodontists in the district. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to study the relationships between these social and economic factors and orthodontic treatment.

Results: The prevalence of orthodontic treatment was 14% of all children aged 8-18, 15% for girls, and 13% for boys, and 23% in the 12 to 15-year age group. Children were less likely to have orthodontic treatment when parents were service or sales workers compared with children whose parents were managers or professionals (aOR = 0.50; 95%CI: [0.34;0.76]), when family income was in the lowest, compared with highest quartile (aOR = 0,62; 95% CI: [0.45;0.85]), when children had no supplementary insurance compared with children covered by private insurance (aOR = 0.53; 95% CI: [0.34; 0.81]), or when they lived in rural compared with urban areas (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: [0.54; 0.91]).

Conclusion: There are social inequalities in orthodontic treatment in France, associated mainly with social status, annual income, supplementary insurance, and the residence area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participation chart

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lathrop ST. The American Heritage Stedman’s Medical Dictionary: Houghton Mifflin. 2005.
    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97–106. - PubMed
    1. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 4. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
    1. ANAES. Recommandations. 2002. Indications de l’orthopédie dento-faciale et dento-maxillo-faciale.
    1. Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectivenessof orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980 Feb;8(1):36–45. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms