Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;45(1):62-78.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01066.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in specialty and general hospitals: analysis of state inpatient data

Peter Cram  1 , Levent Bayman, Joanna Popescu, Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in specialty and general hospitals: analysis of state inpatient data

Peter Cram et al. Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Compare characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized in specialty cardiac and general hospitals for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Data: 2000-2005 all-payor administrative data from Arizona, California, Texas, and Wisconsin.

Study design: We identified patients admitted to specialty and competing general hospitals with AMI or CABG and compared patient demographics, comorbidity, and risk-standardized mortality in specialty and general hospitals.

Principal findings: Specialty hospitals admitted a lower proportion of women and blacks and treated patients with less comorbid illness than general hospitals. Unadjusted in-hospital AMI mortality for Medicare enrollees in specialty and general hospitals was 6.1 and 10.1 percent (p<.0001) and for non-Medicare enrollees was 2.8 and 4.0 percent (p<.04). Unadjusted in-hospital CABG mortality for Medicare enrollees in specialty and general hospitals was 3.2 and 4.7 percent (p<.01) and for non-Medicare enrollees was 1.1 and 1.8 percent (p=.02). After adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital volume, risk-standardized in-hospital mortality for all AMI patients was 2.7 percent for specialty hospitals and 4.1 percent for general hospitals (p<.001) and for CABG was 1.5 percent for specialty hospitals and 2.0 percent for general hospitals (p=.07).

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality in specialty hospitals was lower than in general hospitals for AMI but similar for CABG. Our results suggest that specialty hospitals may offer significantly better outcomes for AMI but not CABG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baron JA, Lu-Yao G, Barrett J, McLerran D, Fisher ES. Internal Validation of Medicare Claims Data. Epidemiology. 1994;5(5):541–4. - PubMed
    1. Barro JR, Huckman RS, Kessler DP. The Effects of Cardiac Specialty Hospitals on the Cost and Quality of Medical Care. Journal of Health Economics. 2006;25(4):702–21. - PubMed
    1. Berenson RA, Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Specialty-Service Lines: Salvos in the New Medical Arms Race. Health Affairs. 2006;25(5):w337–43. - PubMed
    1. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Study of Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals Required in Section 507(c)(2) of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. Washington, DC: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2005. pp. 1–68.
    1. Cram P, Rosenthal GE, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS. Cardiac Revascularization in Specialty and General Hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(14):1454–62. - PubMed

Publication types