Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 10:7:76.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-76.

Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies

Affiliations

Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies

Vernon J Lee et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Individual strategies in pandemic preparedness plans may not reduce the impact of an influenza pandemic.

Methods: We searched modeling publications through PubMed and associated references from 1990 to 30 September 2009. Inclusion criteria were modeling papers quantifying the effectiveness of combination strategies, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical.

Results: Nineteen modeling papers on combination strategies were selected. Four studies examined combination strategies on a global scale, 14 on single countries, and one on a small community. Stochastic individual-based modeling was used in nine studies, stochastic meta-population modeling in five, and deterministic compartmental modeling in another five. As part of combination strategies, vaccination was explored in eight studies, antiviral prophylaxis and/or treatment in 16, area or household quarantine in eight, case isolation in six, social distancing measures in 10 and air travel restriction in six studies. Two studies suggested a high probability of successful influenza epicenter containment with combination strategies under favorable conditions. During a pandemic, combination strategies delayed spread, reduced overall number of cases, and delayed and reduced peak attack rate more than individual strategies. Combination strategies remained effective at high reproductive numbers compared with single strategy. Global cooperative strategies, including redistribution of antiviral drugs, were effective in reducing the global impact and attack rates of pandemic influenza.

Conclusion: Combination strategies increase the effectiveness of individual strategies. They include pharmaceutical (antiviral agents, antibiotics and vaccines) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (case isolation, quarantine, personal hygiene measures, social distancing and travel restriction). Local epidemiological and modeling studies are needed to validate efficacy and feasibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for selection of combination strategy modeling studies.

References

    1. Wang H, Feng Z, Shu Y, Yu H, Zhou L, Zu R, Huai Y, Dong J, Bao C, Wen L, Wang H, Yang P, Zhao W, Dong L, Zhou M, Liao Q, Yang H, Wang M, Lu X, Shi Z, Wang W, Gu L, Zhu F, Li Q, Yin W, Yang W, Li D, Uyeki TM, Wang Y. Probable limited person-to-person transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in China. Lancet. 2008;371:1427–1434. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60493-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Statement by WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan. 2009. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_20090429/en/ind... Accessed 5 May 2009.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO checklist for influenza pandemic preparedness planning. 2005. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/WHO_CDS_CSR_GIP_... Accessed on 24 December 2008.
    1. Ortu G, Mounier-Jack S, Coker R. Pandemic influenza preparedness in Africa is a profound challenge for an already distressed region: analysis of national preparedness plans. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23:161–169. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coker R, Mounier-Jack S. Pandemic influenza preparedness in the Asia-Pacific region. Lancet. 2006;368:886–889. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69209-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types