Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 11:9:229.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-229.

The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C): reliability, validity and acceptability

Paul Sinfield  1 , Richard Baker, Carolyn Tarrant, Shona Agarwal, Andrew M Colman, William Steward, Roger Kockelbergh, John K Mellon
Affiliations

The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C): reliability, validity and acceptability

Paul Sinfield et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patient experience is commonly monitored in evaluating and improving health care, but the experience of carers (partners/relatives/friends) is rarely monitored even though the role of carers can often be substantial. For carers to fulfil their role it is necessary to address their needs. This paper describes an evaluation of the reliability, validity and acceptability of the PCQ-C, a newly developed instrument designed to measure the experiences of carers of men with prostate cancer.

Methods: The reliability, acceptability and validity of the PCQ-C were tested through a postal survey and interviews with carers. The PCQ-C was posted to 1087 prostate cancer patients and patients were asked to pass the questionnaire on to their carer. Non-responders received one reminder. To assess test-retest reliability, 210 carers who had responded to the questionnaire were resent it a second time three weeks later. A subsample of nine carers from patients attending one hospital took part in qualitative interviews to assess validity and acceptability of the PCQ-C. Acceptability to service providers was evaluated based on four hospitals' experiences of running a survey using the PCQ-C.

Results: Questionnaires were returned by 514 carers (47.3%), and the majority of questions showed less than 10% missing data. Across the sections of the questionnaire internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.80 to 0.89), and test-retest stability showed moderate to high stability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.83). Interviews of carers indicated that the PCQ-C was valid and acceptable. Feedback from hospitals indicated that they found the questionnaire useful, and highlighted important considerations for its future use as part of quality improvement initiatives.

Conclusions: The PCQ-C has been found to be acceptable to carers and service providers having been used successfully in hospitals in England. It is ready for use to measure the aspects of care that need to be addressed to improve the quality of prostate cancer care, and for research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health; 2000.
    1. National Audit Office. National Patient Survey (Cancer) Oxford: Picker Institute; 2004.
    1. National Audit Office. Tackling Cancer: Improving the Patient Journey. London: The Stationery Office; 2005.
    1. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J for Quality in Health Care. 2002;14:353–8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. Opinion and Experience: Do They Concur? Oxford: Picker Institute Europe; 2005. http://www.pickereurope.org/Filestore/Downloads/Populus_What_patients_re...

Publication types