Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial)
- PMID: 20003351
- PMCID: PMC2804568
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-76
Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial)
Abstract
Background: Co-bedding, a developmental care strategy, is the practice of caring for diaper clad twins in one incubator (versus separating and caring for each infant in separate incubators), thus creating the opportunity for skin-to-skin contact and touch between the twins. In studies of mothers and their infants, maternal skin-to-skin contact has been shown to decrease procedural pain response according to both behavioral and physiological indicators in very preterm neonates. It is uncertain if this comfort is derived solely from maternal presence or from stabilization of regulatory processes from direct skin contact. The intent of this study is to compare the comfort effect of co-bedding (between twin infants who are co-bedding and those who are not) on infant pain response and physiologic stability during a tissue breaking procedure (heelstick).
Methods/design: Medically stable preterm twin infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit will be randomly assigned to a co-bedding group or a standard care group. Pain response will be measured by physiological and videotaped facial reaction using the Premature Infant Pain Profile scale (PIPP). Recovery from the tissue breaking procedure will be determined by the length of time for heart rate and oxygen saturation to return to baseline. Sixty four sets of twins (n = 128) will be recruited into the study. Analysis and inference will be based on the intention-to-treat principle.
Discussion: If twin contact while co-bedding is determined to have a comforting effect for painful procedures, then changes in current neonatal care practices to include co-bedding may be an inexpensive, non invasive method to help maintain physiologic stability and decrease the long term psychological impact of procedural pain in this high risk population. Knowledge obtained from this study will also add to existing theoretical models with respect to the exact mechanism of comfort through touch.
Trial registration: NCT00917631.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impact of cobedding on sleep patterns in preterm twins.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002 Jul-Aug;41(6):425-31. doi: 10.1177/000992280204100608. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002. PMID: 12166795
-
Co-bedding versus single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;32(3):340-7. doi: 10.1177/0884217503253434. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12774876 Clinical Trial.
-
Cobedding and recovery time after heel lance in preterm twins: results of a randomized trial.Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):500-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0010. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22926182 Clinical Trial.
-
Early relationship environments: physiology of skin-to-skin contact for parents and their preterm infants.Clin Perinatol. 2004 Jun;31(2):287-98, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.04.004. Clin Perinatol. 2004. PMID: 15289033 Review.
-
The impact of pain in the immature brain.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Sep;22(9):722-32. doi: 10.3109/14767050902926962. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009. PMID: 19526425 Review.
Cited by
-
Co-bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 14;4(4):CD008313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27075527 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of melody on the physiological responses of heel sticks pain in neonates.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):405-8. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015. PMID: 26120343 Free PMC article.
-
Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37314064 Free PMC article.
-
Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 2;2015(12):CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6:CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub4. PMID: 26630545 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures.BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(Suppl 2):e011104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011104. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37160360 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stoelhorst GM, Rijken M, Martens SE, Brand R, den Ouden AL, Wit JM, Veen S. Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity. Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):396–405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Nimrod C. Multiple births: trends and patterns in Canada, 1974-1990. Health Report. 1992;4:223–50. - PubMed
-
- Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report. Ottawa. 2003.
-
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report. 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical