Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Dec 11:9:76.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-76.

Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial)

Marsha L Campbell-Yeo  1 , C Celeste Johnston, Ks Joseph, Nancy L Feeley, Christine T Chambers, Keith J Barrington
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial)

Marsha L Campbell-Yeo et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Co-bedding, a developmental care strategy, is the practice of caring for diaper clad twins in one incubator (versus separating and caring for each infant in separate incubators), thus creating the opportunity for skin-to-skin contact and touch between the twins. In studies of mothers and their infants, maternal skin-to-skin contact has been shown to decrease procedural pain response according to both behavioral and physiological indicators in very preterm neonates. It is uncertain if this comfort is derived solely from maternal presence or from stabilization of regulatory processes from direct skin contact. The intent of this study is to compare the comfort effect of co-bedding (between twin infants who are co-bedding and those who are not) on infant pain response and physiologic stability during a tissue breaking procedure (heelstick).

Methods/design: Medically stable preterm twin infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit will be randomly assigned to a co-bedding group or a standard care group. Pain response will be measured by physiological and videotaped facial reaction using the Premature Infant Pain Profile scale (PIPP). Recovery from the tissue breaking procedure will be determined by the length of time for heart rate and oxygen saturation to return to baseline. Sixty four sets of twins (n = 128) will be recruited into the study. Analysis and inference will be based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion: If twin contact while co-bedding is determined to have a comforting effect for painful procedures, then changes in current neonatal care practices to include co-bedding may be an inexpensive, non invasive method to help maintain physiologic stability and decrease the long term psychological impact of procedural pain in this high risk population. Knowledge obtained from this study will also add to existing theoretical models with respect to the exact mechanism of comfort through touch.

Trial registration: NCT00917631.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Allocation of participants to study groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stoelhorst GM, Rijken M, Martens SE, Brand R, den Ouden AL, Wit JM, Veen S. Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity. Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):396–405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luke B, Brown MB. The effect of plurality and gestation on the prevention or postponement of infant mortality: 1989-1991 versus 1999-2001. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10(3):514–520. doi: 10.1375/twin.10.3.514. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Nimrod C. Multiple births: trends and patterns in Canada, 1974-1990. Health Report. 1992;4:223–50. - PubMed
    1. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report. Ottawa. 2003.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report. 2008.

Associated data