Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 16:8:57.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-57.

Perceived body image in men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: correlation of body mass index with the figure rating scale

Collaborators, Affiliations

Perceived body image in men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: correlation of body mass index with the figure rating scale

Harold E Bays et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Body mass index (BMI) is often used as an objective surrogate estimate of body fat. Increased BMI is directly associated with an increase in metabolic disease, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS) is a subjective measure of body fat, and self-perceptions of body image conceivably impact the development and treatment of T2DM. This study examined the self-perception of body image to various levels of BMI among those with T2DM.

Methods: Respondents (n = 13,887) to the US Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD) 2006 survey self-reported their weight and height for BMI calculation. On the gender-specific Stunkard FRS, respondents selected the figure most closely resembling their body image. Spearman correlation was computed between perceived body image and BMI for men and women separately. Student's t-test analysis compared the mean BMI differences between respondents with and without T2DM.

Results: Men with T2DM did not significantly differ from men without diabetes mellitus in mean BMI per body image figure except at the extremes in body figures. Women with T2DM had a significantly higher BMI for the same body figure compared with women without diabetes mellitus for most figures (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Individuals, particularly women, with T2DM may differ in their perception of body image compared with those without diabetes mellitus. It is unclear if these perceived differences increase the risk of T2DM, or if the diagnosis of T2DM alters body image perceptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Body image figures and mean body mass index (BMI) for men and women with and without diabetes. DM = diabetes mellitus; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between Figure Rating Scale and body mass index (BMI). Correlation significant for each group (p < 0.0001). DM = diabetes mellitus; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stunkard AJ, Sorenson T, Schulsinger F. In: Genetics of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Kety SS, Rowland LP, Sidman RL, Matthysse SW, editor. New York: Raven Press; 1983. Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness; pp. 115–120.
    1. Bays HE, Chapman RH, Grandy S. The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:737–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01336.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sorbara M, Geliebter A. Body image disturbance in obese outpatients before and after weight loss in relation to race, gender, binge eating, and age of onset of obesity. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;31:416–423. doi: 10.1002/eat.10046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rozin P, Fallon A. Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: a comparison of men and women in two generations. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988;97:342–345. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.342. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith DE, Thompson JK, Raczynski JM, Hilner JE. Body image among men and women in a biracial cohort: The CARDIA Study. Int J Eat Disord. 1999;25:71–82. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199901)25:1<71::AID-EAT9>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI - PubMed