[Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study]
- PMID: 20003790
[Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study]
Abstract
Objective: To compare Piver radical hysterectomy (RH) with nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) for cervical cancer patients in terms of postoperative physiology of pelvic autonomic nerve and perioperative complications.
Methods: Ninety-three consecutive patients with invasive cervical cancer underwent RH (69 cases) or NSRH (24 cases) from March 2005 to March 2006 at Fudan University Cancer Hospital. The postoperative function of bladder, bowel and sexual function and perioperative morbidity were assessed.
Results: Compared with patients received RH, patients underwent NSRH presented a significantly prompter recovery of bladder function (8.7 vs. 14.8 days, P < 0.01) and bowel function (2.9 vs. 3.2 days, P < 0.01). However, there were not significant difference in terms of operative time (146.7 vs. 143.3 minutes, P > 0.05), estimated blood loss (441.7 vs. 565.9 ml, P > 0.05) and hospital stay (10.21 vs. 10.19 days, P > 0.05). No positive surgical margin was found in both groups. No surgery complication was found in NSRH group, while there were 1 case presented the infection of lymphocyst and 1 case presented intestinal obstruction in RH group. After following up postoperative 6 months, the patients received NSRH had a higher rate of satisfaction at sex activity than those received RH (29% vs. 9%, P = 0.042).
Conclusion: NSRH is safe and feasible surgical management for cervical cancer patients, which would improved the physiology of pelvic autonomic nerve postoperatively.
Similar articles
-
[Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;33(1):53-7. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 21575466 Chinese.
-
[A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):606-10. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 19087497 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
[Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May;44(5):359-63. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19573312 Chinese.
-
[Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in the case of cervical cancer].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Jul 12;147(28):1344-7. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003. PMID: 12892008 Review. Dutch.
-
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 12;2(2):CD012828. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012828.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30746689 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 3;14(7):e0217775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217775. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31269024 Free PMC article.
-
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.Prz Menopauzalny. 2014 Jun;13(3):180-5. doi: 10.5114/pm.2014.43822. Epub 2014 Jun 30. Prz Menopauzalny. 2014. PMID: 26327852 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e94116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094116. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24748015 Free PMC article.