Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Jan;11(1):55-65.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial

Kathy S Albain et al. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay is prognostic for women with node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. A low recurrence score predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive breast cancer, we investigated whether the recurrence score was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher risks of recurrence.

Methods: The phase 3 trial SWOG-8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer showed that chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) before tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to treatment with tamoxifen alone. Optional tumour banking yielded specimens for determination of recurrence score by RT-PCR. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the effect of recurrence score on disease-free survival by treatment group (tamoxifen vs CAF-T) using Cox regression, adjusting for number of positive nodes.

Findings: There were 367 specimens (40% of the 927 patients in the tamoxifen and CAF-T groups) with sufficient RNA for analysis (tamoxifen, n=148; CAF-T, n=219). The recurrence score was prognostic in the tamoxifen-alone group (p=0.006; hazard ratio [HR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.33-5.27, for a 50-point difference in recurrence score). There was no benefit of CAF in patients with a low recurrence score (score <18; log-rank p=0.97; HR 1.02, 0.54-1.93), but an improvement in disease-free survival for those with a high recurrence score (score > or =31; log-rank p=0.033; HR 0.59, 0.35-1.01), after adjustment for number of positive nodes. The recurrence score by treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0.029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0.58), although the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival.

Interpretation: The recurrence score is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant benefit of CAF in tumours with a high recurrence score. A low recurrence score identifies women who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite positive nodes.

Funding: National Cancer Institute and Genomic Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modified REMARK diagram, showing the specimen acquisition, distribution and processing for the RT-PCR analyses, resulting in the final sample size of 367 patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prognostic disease-free survival and overall survival analyses by Recurrence Score (RS) group in patients treated with tamoxifen alone. Panel A depicts disease-free survival and Panel B, overall survival. The log-rank tests are stratified by number of positive nodes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Primary disease-free survival endpoint by treatment and Recurrence Score (RS) groups. The log-rank tests are stratified by number of positive nodes. Panel A shows disease-free survival by treatment (CAF followed by tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone) overall, and Panels B–D depicts the outcomes within each RS risk group of low, intermediate, and high, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Secondary endpoints of overall survival by Recurrence Score (RS) groups (Panels A, B and C) and the exploratory endpoint of breast cancer specific survival by RS groups (Panels D, E and F), all adjusted for number of positive nodes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Disease-free survival hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for tamoxifen alone versus CAF followed by tamoxifen displayed (from top to bottom) for the overall parent trial, the entire Recurrence Score (RS) sample, and RS groups of low, intermediate, and high. The diamond indicates all years, the circle the first 5 years and the square, after 5 years.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Risks of a disease-free survival (DFS) event by linear Recurrence Score, by treatment (tamoxifen alone and CAF followed by tamoxifen) and number of positive nodes, depicted for 10-year (left panel) and 5-year (right panel) landmarks. In each panel, the top two lines are represent the subset with 4 or more positive axillary nodes and the bottom 2 lines, 1–3 positive nodes.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Walker MG, Watson D, Park T, Hiller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Bryant J, Wolmark N. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2817–26. - PubMed
    1. Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, Capra A, Alexander C, Pho M, Baker J, Walker M, Watson D, Hackett J, Blick NT, Greenberg D, Fehrenbacher L, Langholz B, Quesenberry CP. A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Research. 2006;8(3):R25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AAM, Voskuil DW, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;247:1999–2009. - PubMed
    1. Van’t Veer LJ, Paik S, Hayes DF. Gene expression profiling of breast cancer: a new tumor marker. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(8):1631–5. - PubMed
    1. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, Cronin W, Baehner BL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino J, Geyer CE, Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3726–3734. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

Grants and funding