Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar;30(2):203-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review

Affiliations
Review

Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review

Josh M Cisler et al. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

A wealth of research demonstrates attentional biases toward threat in the anxiety disorders. Several models have been advanced to explain these biases in anxiety, yet the mechanisms comprising and mediating the biases remain unclear. In the present article, we review evidence regarding the mechanisms of attentional biases through careful examination of the components of attentional bias, the mechanisms underlying these components, and the stage of information processing during which the biases occur. Facilitated attention, difficulty in disengagement, and attentional avoidance comprise the components of attentional bias. A threat detection mechanism likely underlies facilitated attention, a process that may be neurally centered around the amygdala. Attentional control ability likely underlies difficulty in disengagement, emotion regulation goals likely underlie attentional avoidance, and both of these processes may be neurally centered around prefrontal cortex functioning. The threat detection mechanism may be a mostly automatic process, attentional avoidance may be a mostly strategic process, and difficulty in disengagement may be a mixture of automatic and strategic processing. Recommendations for future research are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible representation of the interrelations between the attentional components, mediating mechanisms, and stage of information processing in attentional biases towards threat among anxious individuals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Algom D, Chajut E, Lev S. A rational look at the emotional Stroop paradigm: a generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133:323–338. - PubMed
    1. Amir N, Beard C, Burns M, Bomyea J. Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2009;118:28–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N, Beard C, Taylor CT, Klumpp H, Elias J, Burns M. Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;77:961–973. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N, Weber G, Beard C, Bomyea J, Taylor CT. The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2008;117:860–868. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N, Elias J, Klumpp H, Przeworski A. Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2003;41:1325–1335. - PubMed