Metastasis: inherent vs. acquired phenotype
- PMID: 20006450
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.023
Metastasis: inherent vs. acquired phenotype
Abstract
The problem how tumor cells get the metastatic ability is still a hot debate. Based on the premise that the default state of normal cells is quiescent rather than mobile, the classic progression and early metastasis model suggested that tumor metastasis should be an acquired trait contributed by the late or early gene mutations during carcinogenesis. Here, an inherent metastasis model is proposed that the metastatic ability of the tumor cells is one of the constitutive features of the normal cells of tumor origin. The idea is based on two facts. One is that tumor arises from stem or progenitor cells and in turn are driven by tumor stem cells. The other is that emerging evidence showing that a small population of stem or progenitor cells has the inherent migration capacity in normal development and adulthood. This inherent metastatic model has some implications. First, metastatic dissemination should occur continually throughout the course of primary tumor development and generate a diverse spectrum of disseminated cells. Second, most of the disseminated tumor cells should have the stem cell like features. Third, migration of stem cells and cancer cells should invoke similar molecular processes involving metastasis. Fourth, genomic alterations that primarily promote the production of tumor cells with stem cell traits, i.e., tumor stem cell, exacerbate tumor progression and metastasis. Finally, overt metastatic production is primarily determined by whether the disseminated tumor cells can survive and grow into overt metastatic foci at the ectopic sites, instead of that whether the tumor cells can leave the primary sites and travel to other sites. All these predictions have gotten increasing supporting evidences. Yet, to confirm whether the new paradigm is true or false, it needs carefully examine whether normal stem or progenitor cells of various tissues have the potential to traveling and arriving at the ectopic sites. Furthermore, exploiting the mechanisms for regulating normal stem or progenitor cells migration may provide more critical results for our deeply understanding the secrets of tumor metastasis and offer new methods for preventing and treating tumor metastasis.
Similar articles
-
Chemokines in neuroectodermal development and their potential implication in cancer stem cell-driven metastasis.Semin Cancer Biol. 2009 Apr;19(2):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009. PMID: 19084599 Review.
-
Mechanisms of cancer metastasis: involvement of cancer stem cells?Minerva Med. 2010 Jun;101(3):179-91. Minerva Med. 2010. PMID: 20562805 Review.
-
Is repetitive wounding and bone marrow-derived stem cell mediated-repair an etiology of lung cancer development and dissemination?Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(4):951-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.12.050. Epub 2006 May 22. Med Hypotheses. 2006. PMID: 16714090
-
Metastasis suppression: the evolving role of metastasis suppressor genes for regulating cancer cell growth at the secondary site.J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1122-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051580.89109.4b. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12576866 Review.
-
Functions of tumorigenic and migrating cancer progenitor cells in cancer progression and metastasis and their therapeutic implications.Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007 Mar;26(1):203-14. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9052-4. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007. PMID: 17273942 Review.
Cited by
-
Reasons for cancer metastasis: A holistic perspective.Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;3(6):1199-1202. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.623. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26807220 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive cancers are not necessarily from preformed in situ tumours - an alternative way of carcinogenesis from misplaced stem cells.J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Jul;17(7):921-6. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 7. J Cell Mol Med. 2013. PMID: 23741988 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources