Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jan;124(1):121-7.
doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1240121.

The effect of sex hormones on bone resorption by rat osteoclasts

Affiliations

The effect of sex hormones on bone resorption by rat osteoclasts

J H Tobias et al. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991 Jan.

Abstract

Although sex hormones are important in the attainment and maintenance of bone mass, the mechanism by which they exert their effect is unknown. We therefore tested the effects of estradiol-17 beta, dihydrotestosterone, and progesterone on osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone. Osteoclasts were disaggregated from neonatal rat long bones, and incubated with or without the addition of osteoblastic cells or osteoblast-like cell lines. Bone resorption was assessed by scanning electron microscopy as the extent of excavation of the bone surface after incubation. We found dihydrotestosterone (1-100 nmol/l) and progesterone (10-1000 nmol/l) to have no significant effect on bone resorption. By contrast, E2 (1 nmol/l) reduced bone resorption in osteoclast cultures to which osteoblasts had been added, by approximately 25%, although consistent inhibition with other concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 10 nmol/l) was not observed. To our surprise, E2 was also associated with a delayed, dose-responsive, stimulation of bone resorption, in the range 0.1-10 nmol/l, in osteoclast cultures free from added osteoblastic cells. Tamoxifen, which itself had no effect on bone resorption, appeared to antagonise these E2 effects. Although the physiological significance of the stimulatory effect is unclear, we hypothesize that its presence prevented us, and previous workers, from observing dose-responsive inhibition of bone resorption by E2 in vitro.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types