Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;48(1):53-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.001.

Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: a presentation of methods and review of current practice

Affiliations
Review

Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: a presentation of methods and review of current practice

Amanda J Fairchild et al. J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Third variable effects elucidate the relation between two other variables, and can describe why they are related or under what conditions they are related. This article demonstrates methods to analyze two third-variable effects: moderation and mediation. The utility of examining moderation and mediation effects in school psychology is described and current use of the analyses in applied school psychology research is reviewed and evaluated. Proper statistical methods to test the effects are presented, and different effect size measures for the models are provided. Extensions of the basic moderator and mediator models are also described.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual path diagram of the mediation reading program example.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual path diagram of the moderation reading program example.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency histogram of moderation and mediation publications in selected school psychology journals over time.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Differentiating interaction effects. The solid line in each graph across the panels pertains to the XY relation at one level of the moderator variable (i.e., learning disabled). The dashed line in each graph across the panels pertains to the XY relation at the other level of the moderator variable (i.e., not learning disabled).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The basic moderation model. X=the independent variable, Y=the dependent variable, Z=the moderator variable, XZ=the interaction of the independent and moderator variables, β^1 = the effect of the independent variable on the outcome controlling for Z and XZ, β^2 = the effect of the moderator on the outcome controlling for X and XZ, and β^3 = the effect of the XZ interaction on the outcome controlling for the lower order effects. *Corresponds to p<.05 and ns corresponds to not significant. Correlations among the predictor variables are approximately zero because of the balanced design in the example.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Plot of the interaction for the numerical reading program example.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The basic mediation model. X=the independent variable, Y=the dependent variable, M=the mediator variable, β^1M=the effect of the independent variable on the mediator, β^2Y=the effect of the mediator on the outcome controlling for X, and β^1Y=the direct effect of the X on Y controlling for M. *Corresponds to p<.05, **corresponds to p<.001 and ns corresponds to not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abelson RP. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;97:129–133.
    1. Aguinis H. Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2004.
    1. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
    1. Alwin DF, Hauser RM. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review. 1975;40:37–47.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources