Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;48(2):479-82.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01677-09. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

Caspofungin Etest endpoint for Aspergillus isolates shows poor agreement with the reference minimum effective concentration

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Caspofungin Etest endpoint for Aspergillus isolates shows poor agreement with the reference minimum effective concentration

Jeff Fuller et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi now includes guidelines for testing echinocandin activity using the minimum effective concentration (MEC) as the endpoint measurement. In this study, we compared the caspofungin Etest MIC on RPMI agar and Mueller-Hinton agar (supplemented with glucose and methylene blue [MGM]) to the BMD MEC for 345 clinical Aspergillus isolates, including A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus. The essential agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution) of the Etest on MGM and RPMI agar with the reference BMD MEC was 18 and 26%, respectively. The geometric mean values for BMD MEC and MGM Etest were 0.137 and 0.024 microg/ml, respectively, and the geometric mean values for BMD and RPMI agar were 0.128 and 0.031 microg/ml, respectively. Comparatively, 91% of paired MGM and RPMI Etest results were within 2 log(2) dilutions of each other and consistently produced clearly defined endpoints. In conclusion, the caspofungin Etest MIC, like the BMD MEC, is a reproducible endpoint but is markedly lower than the reference BMD. In anticipation of susceptibility breakpoint assignments, optimization studies will be required to improve the concordance of these two assays so that the potential for underreporting echinocandin resistance in Aspergillus is mitigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arikan, S., M. Lozano-Chiu, V. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 2001. In vitro susceptibility testing methods for caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:327-330. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, R. P. Rennie, P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown. 2002. Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1781-1784. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2004. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved guideline. Document M44-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi; approved standard. Document M38-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    1. Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, L. B. Boyken, S. Tendolkar, J. Kroeger, and M. A. Pfaller. 2007. Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1974-1977. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types