Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22358-63.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911376106. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

Differences in human and chimpanzee gene expression patterns define an evolving network of transcription factors in brain

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in human and chimpanzee gene expression patterns define an evolving network of transcription factors in brain

Katja Nowick et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Humans differ from other primates by marked differences in cognitive abilities and a significantly larger brain. These differences correlate with metabolic changes, as evidenced by the relative up-regulation of energy-related genes and metabolites in human brain. While the mechanisms underlying these evolutionary changes have not been elucidated, altered activities of key transcription factors (TFs) could play a pivotal role. To assess this possibility, we analyzed microarray data from five tissues from humans and chimpanzees. We identified 90 TF genes with significantly different expression levels in human and chimpanzee brain among which the rapidly evolving KRAB-zinc finger genes are markedly over-represented. The differentially expressed TFs cluster within a robust regulatory network consisting of two distinct but interlinked modules, one strongly associated with energy metabolism functions, and the other with transcription, vesicular transport, and ubiquitination. Our results suggest that concerted changes in a relatively small number of interacting TFs may coordinate major gene expression differences in human and chimpanzee brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Percentage of differentially expressed genes among human and chimpanzee tissues. The proportion of all genes (white), all transcription factors (light gray), all KRAB-ZNF (KZNF) genes (gray), conserved KRAB-ZNF genes (dark gray), or primate-specific KRAB-ZNF genes (black) that are differentially expressed between species (t test, P < 0.01) is shown separately for each tissue. Asterisks mark values that represent significant enrichment. Numbers of genes per category are between 7 and 6,720.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Strategy to obtain TF-associated gene sets. Summary of the strategy used to identify positively and negatively associated gene sets for the network analysis. Details are described in the text.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Weighted topological overlap network between brain-changed transcription factors. Using as an input the correlations of the full set of TF-associated genes in human samples, the wTO network was calculated between the 79 ubiquitously expressed brain-changed transcription factors (∣ωij∣ > 0.3). TFs up-regulated in human brain compared with chimpanzee brain are shown in red, and down-regulated TFs are shown in green. Positive and negative links between TFs are shown in red and green, respectively. Numbers label the four TFs with the highest BC scores.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Difference in number of species-specific links among TFs in the human and chimpanzee wTO network. For each TF, the difference in the number of human- vs. chimpanzee-specific links is plotted. For definition of species-specific links, see the text. Genes with the largest numbers of human-specific links are positioned at top. The mean difference is 1.3 and 2 SDs are 10.3.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
GO categories over-represented among genes associated with the TFs of each module. The program FUNC (25) was used to test for GO categories enriched among associated gene sets of TFs of each module. The sizes of the pie segments are proportional to the number of genes annotated in a given enriched (P < 0.05) GO category. The legend is sorted by size of the pie segments, going from the biggest to the smallest segment in Module 1 and then from the smallest to the biggest segment in Module 2.

References

    1. Varki A, Altheide TK. Comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes: Searching for needles in a haystack. Genome Res. 2005;15:1746–1758. - PubMed
    1. Khaitovich P, et al. Metabolic changes in schizophrenia and human brain evolution. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sokoloff L. Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in man. Methods Med Res. 1960;8:253–261. - PubMed
    1. Blekhman R, Oshlack A, Chabot AE, Smyth GK, Gilad Y. Gene regulation in primates evolves under tissue-specific selection pressures. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uddin M, et al. Sister grouping of chimpanzees and humans as revealed by genome-wide phylogenetic analysis of brain gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2957–2962. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources