The choking game: physician perspectives
- PMID: 20008424
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1287
The choking game: physician perspectives
Abstract
Objective: The goal was to assess awareness of the choking game among physicians who care for adolescents and to explore their opinions regarding its inclusion in anticipatory guidance.
Methods: We surveyed 865 pediatricians and family practitioners. The survey was designed to assess physicians' awareness of the choking game and its warning signs, the suspected prevalence of patients' participation in the activity, and the willingness of physicians to include the choking game in adolescent anticipatory guidance. Information on the general use of anticipatory guidance also was collected.
Results: The survey was completed by 163 physicians (response rate: 21.8%). One-hundred eleven (68.1%) had heard of the choking game, 68 of them (61.3%) through sources in the popular media. General pediatricians were significantly more likely to report being aware of the choking game than were family practitioners or pediatric subspecialists (P = .004). Of physicians who were aware of the choking game, 75.7% identified >or=1 warning sign and 52.3% identified >or=3. Only 7.6% of physicians who were aware of the choking game reported that they cared for a patient they suspected was participating in the activity, and 2 (1.9%) reported that they include the choking game in anticipatory guidance for adolescents. However, 64.9% of all respondents agreed that the choking game should be included in anticipatory guidance.
Conclusions: Close to one third of physicians surveyed were unaware of the choking game, a potentially life-threatening activity practiced by adolescents. Despite acknowledging that the choking game should be included in adolescent anticipatory guidance, few physicians reported actually discussing it. To provide better care for their adolescent patients, pediatricians and family practitioners should be knowledgeable about risky behaviors encountered by their patients, including the choking game, and provide timely guidance about its dangers.
Similar articles
-
Poison prevention counseling: a comparison between family practitioners and pediatricians.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jan;154(1):65-70. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000. PMID: 10632253
-
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520092
-
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520094
-
The choking game: a risky behavior for youth.J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2013 Dec;51(12):15-20. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20131029-01. Epub 2013 Nov 7. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2013. PMID: 24200913 Review.
-
Pediatric choking.Del Med J. 2004 Sep;76(9):335-40. Del Med J. 2004. PMID: 15510972 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and associated harm of engagement in self-asphyxial behaviours ('choking game') in young people: a systematic review.Arch Dis Child. 2015 Dec;100(12):1106-14. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308187. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Arch Dis Child. 2015. PMID: 26111816 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent Experiences with Self-Asphyxial Behaviors and Problematic Drinking in Emerging Adulthood.Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Jul 31;8:2333794X211037985. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211037985. eCollection 2021. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021. PMID: 34377748 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Education on School-aged Children's Knowledge of and Participation in "The Choking Game".Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci. 2016 Jun;2(2):18-25. Epub 2016 Jun 13. Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci. 2016. PMID: 27504500 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of the Choking Game: parent perspectives.J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jul;4(2):73-8. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i2.119. Epub 2011 Apr 16. J Inj Violence Res. 2012. PMID: 21502782 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical