Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace
- PMID: 20008494
- PMCID: PMC2793024
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup384
Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace
Comment on
-
Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.Europace. 2010 Jan;12(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup252. Europace. 2010. PMID: 19762332 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Johnson AD, Larken SL, Engler RL. Hemodynamic compromise associated with ventriculoatrial conduction following transvenous pacemaker placement. Am J Med. 1978;65:75–9. - PubMed
-
- Amikams RE. Untoward hemodynamic consequences of permanent ventricular pacing associated with ventriculo-atrial conduction. In: Meere CE, editor. Proceedings of the VI World Symposium on Cardiac Pacing; Montreal; 1979. Chapter 15–16.
-
- Levine PA, Mace RC. The Pacemaker Syndrome in Pacing Therapy: A Guide to Cardiac Pacing for Optimum Hemodynamic Benefit. Mt Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 1983. pp. 3–18. Chapter 1.
-
- The DAVID Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular back-up pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:3115–23. - PubMed
-
- Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA, Flaker GC, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:245–51. - PubMed
