Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Dec 15;23(24):2799-805.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1882109.

Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint

Affiliations
Review

Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint

Vincent Vanoosthuyse et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Spindle checkpoint silencing is a critical step during mitosis that initiates chromosome segregation, yet surprisingly little is known about its mechanism. Protein phosphatase I (PP1) was shown recently to be a key player in this process, and in this issue of Genes & Deverlopment, Akiyoshi and colleagues (pp. 2887-2899) identify budding yeast Fin1p as a kinetochore-localized regulator of PP1 activity toward checkpoint targets. Here we review recent mechanistic insights and propose a working model for spindle checkpoint silencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kinetochore-localized PP1 opposes Aurora B activity to promote anaphase onset. Aurora B regulates the metaphase–anaphase transition in at least two ways: (1) destabilization of kinetochore–microtubule connections failing to produce tension, and (2) activation of the spindle checkpoint. We propose that interaction between a kinetochore component (e.g., Spc105/KNL1) and PP1 is required to counteract both processes. However, distinct substrate-specifying regulators of PP1 oppose different Aurora B functions on kinetochores. Fin1p-associated PP1 (PP1Fin1) opposes Aurora B action in the spindle checkpoint and promotes spindle checkpoint silencing. Another as-yet-unknown regulator of PP1 might counteract the Aurora-dependent microtubule-destabilizing activity.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akiyoshi B, Nelson CR, Ranish JA, Biggins S. Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. Genes & Dev. 2009 doi: 10.1101/gad.1865909. (this issue). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews PD, Ovechkina Y, Morrice N, Wagenbach M, Duncan K, Wordeman L, Swedlow JR. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev Cell. 2004;6:253–268. - PubMed
    1. Bollen M, Gerlich DW, Lesage B. Mitotic phosphatases: From entry guards to exit guides. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:531–541. - PubMed
    1. Canman JC, Sharma N, Straight A, Shannon KB, Fang G, Salmon ED. Anaphase onset does not require the microtubule-dependent depletion of kinetochore and centromere-binding proteins. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:3787–3795. - PubMed
    1. Chan YW, Fava LL, Uldschmid A, Schmitz MH, Gerlich DW, Nigg EA, Santamaria A. Mitotic control of kinetochore-associated dynein and spindle orientation by human Spindly. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:859–874. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources