Clinical examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury
- PMID: 20009681
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b604
Clinical examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a protocol that assesses the efficacy and sensitivity of clinical examination in complement with computed tomographic (CT) scan in screening for cervical spine (c-spine) injury.
Methods: During the 26-month period from March 2005 to May 2007, blunt trauma patients older than 13 years were prospectively entered into a study protocol. If patients were awake and alert with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) >or=14, clinical examination of the neck was performed. Clinical examination was performed regardless of distracting injuries. If the patient had no complaints of pain or tenderness, the cervical collar was removed. Patients with complaints of c-spine pain or tenderness and patients with GCS score <14 underwent CT scanning for evaluation of the entire c-spine.
Results: One thousand six hundred eighty seven patients were prospectively assessed for blunt c-spine injury. Fourteen hundred thirty-nine patients had GCS score >or=14, 897 (62%) of which had a negative clinical examination of the c-spine and subsequently had cervical collars removed. Two patients (0.2%) whose clinical examination results disclosed nothing abnormal were later found to have a c-spine injury. Five hundred forty-two patients with GCS score >or=14 had a positive c-spine clinical examination, of which 134 (24%) were diagnosed with c-spine injury. One hundred thirty-three (99%) c-spine injuries were identified by CT scan. The c-spine injury missed by CT scan was a radiologic misinterpretation. For patients with c-spine injury with GCS score >or=14, both sensitivities of clinical examination and CT scan were 99%. Two hundred forty-eight patients had GCS score <14, of which 5 (2.0%) were diagnosed with c-spine injury. CT scan identified all c-spine injuries for patients with GCS score <14.
Conclusions: In awake and alert blunt trauma patients, clinical examination is a sensitive screening method for c-spine injury. Clinical examination allows for the majority of blunt trauma patients to have their c-spines cleared safely without radiologic screening. Clinical examination in complement with CT scan is a sensitive and an effective method for identification of c-spine injury in awake and alert patients with symptoms of c-spine injury. CT scan is the sensitive and effective test for screening and diagnosis of c-spine injury in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
Comment in
-
Clinical examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury.J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1269. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d7abba. J Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20453785 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinical clearance of the cervical spine in patients with distracting injuries: It is time to dispel the myth.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):498-502. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182587634. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012. PMID: 23019677
-
Thoracolumbar spine clearance: Clinical examination for patients with distracting injuries.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jan;80(1):125-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000884. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016. PMID: 26491795
-
Clearing the cervical spine in patients with distracting injuries: An AAST multi-institutional trial.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jan;86(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002063. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019. PMID: 30188422 Clinical Trial.
-
Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan--a meta-analysis and cohort study.Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 12. Injury. 2013. PMID: 23856632 Review.
-
Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma.J Neurosurg. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-9. doi: 10.3171/2011.4.JNS101672. Epub 2011 May 27. J Neurosurg. 2011. PMID: 21619408 Review.
Cited by
-
Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 22;3(3):CD011686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011686.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38517085 Free PMC article.
-
Occult subaxial cervical disco-ligamentous injuries in computer tomography negative trauma patients.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1277-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4925-2. Epub 2016 Dec 27. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28028650
-
Cervical spine clearance after blunt trauma: current state of the art.EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Apr 6;5(4):253-259. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190047. eCollection 2020 May. EFORT Open Rev. 2020. PMID: 32373348 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of blunt traumatic injuries and hospital admission based on history and physical exam.World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 31;11(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0099-9. eCollection 2016. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. PMID: 27588036 Free PMC article.
-
Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in pediatric trauma patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):CD011686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011686.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 22;3:CD011686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011686.pub3. PMID: 29215711 Free PMC article. Updated.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical