Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May 1;54(1):63-70.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c6c65c.

Early clinical and programmatic outcomes with tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy in Zambia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Early clinical and programmatic outcomes with tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy in Zambia

Benjamin H Chi et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: In July 2007, amid some controversy over cost, Zambia was the first African country to introduce tenofovir (TDF) as a component of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) on a wide scale.

Methods: We compared drug substitutions, mortality, and "programmatic failure" among adults starting TDF-, zidovudine (ZDV)-, and stavudine (d4T)-containing ART. Programmatic failure was defined as death, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up.

Results: Between July 2007 and January 2009, 10,485 adults initiated ART (66% on TDF, 23% on ZDV, 11% on d4T), with a median follow-up time of 239 (interquartile range 98, 385) days. Those starting TDF were more likely to be male and more likely to have indicators of severe disease at baseline. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, ZDV- (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.30-3.28) and d4T-based regimens (AHR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.55-2.38) were associated with higher risk for drug substitution when compared with TDF-based regimens. Similar hazards were noted for overall mortality (ZDV: AHR = 0 .81, 95% CI = 0.62-1.06; d4T: AHR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.74-1.43) and programmatic failure (ZDV: AHR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88-1.11; d4T: AHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.96-1.28) when compared with TDF.

Conclusions: TDF is associated with similar clinical and programmatic outcomes as ZDV and d4T but appears to be better tolerated. Although further evaluation is needed, these results are encouraging and support Zambia's policy decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HIV-infected adults initiating antiretroviral therapy across 18 Lusaka primary care sites from July 1, 2007 to January 31, 2009
Figure 2
Figure 2
Numbers of HIV-infected adults initiated on each of the three primary nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for antiretroviral therapy from July 1, 2007 to January 31, 2009.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis describing over time drug substitution (A), mortality (B), and “program failure” (C), stratified by initially prescribed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for antiretroviral therapy. Program failure comprised mortality, program withdrawals, and follow-up losses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis describing over time drug substitution (A), mortality (B), and “program failure” (C), stratified by initially prescribed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for antiretroviral therapy. Program failure comprised mortality, program withdrawals, and follow-up losses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis describing over time drug substitution (A), mortality (B), and “program failure” (C), stratified by initially prescribed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for antiretroviral therapy. Program failure comprised mortality, program withdrawals, and follow-up losses.

References

    1. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):191–201. - PubMed
    1. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 19;354(3):251–260. - PubMed
    1. Willig JH, Abroms S, Westfall AO, et al. Increased regimen durability in the era of once-daily fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2008 Oct 1;22(15):1951–1960. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DART Virology Group and Trial Team Virological response to a triple nucleoside/nucleotide analogue regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1-infected adults in Africa. AIDS. 2006 Jun 26;20(10):1391–1399. - PubMed
    1. Medecins Sans Frontieres Untangling the web of antiretroviral price reductions: 11th edition. [March 2, 2009]. http://www.msfaccess.org.

Publication types