Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients
- PMID: 20009795
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb5cf8
Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients
Abstract
Background: In recent years, there has been a growing acceptance of the value of breast reconstruction. The majority of women who choose to proceed will undergo alloplastic reconstruction. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the type of implant used in alloplastic breast reconstruction has an impact on patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life.
Methods: Patients were deemed eligible if they had completed alloplastic reconstruction at least 1 year before study initiation. Patients were contacted by mail: two questionnaires [the BREAST-Q and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (Br23) (EORTC QLQC30 (Br23))], a contact letter, and an incentive gift card were included. Scores were compared between silicone and saline implant recipients.
Results: Seventy-five silicone implant recipients and 68 saline implant recipients responded, for a response rate of 58 percent. BREAST-Q responses showed silicone implant recipients to have higher scores on all nine subscales. This difference reached statistical significance on four of nine subscales: overall satisfaction (p = 0.008), psychological well-being (p = 0.032), sexual well-being (p = 0.05), and satisfaction with surgeon (p = 0.019). Regression analysis adjusted for follow-up time, timing of surgery, unilateral versus bilateral surgery, radiation, and age. Results from the EORTC QLQC30 (Br23) showed a statistically significant difference on two of 22 subscales: silicone recipients had higher overall physical function, and saline recipients had higher systemic side effects.
Conclusions: This study has shown higher satisfaction with breast reconstruction in silicone gel implant recipients compared with saline recipients using the BREAST-Q. There was no difference in overall global health status between the two patient groups as measured by the EORTC-QLQC30 (Br23).
Similar articles
-
Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):431-441. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6d55. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23142936
-
Implant breast reconstruction and radiation: a multicenter analysis of long-term health-related quality of life and satisfaction.Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2159-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3483-2. Epub 2014 Apr 18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24740825
-
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul;146(1):117-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z. Epub 2014 May 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014. PMID: 24831775
-
Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):278-89. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0025-9. Epub 2013 Jan 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23354761 Review.
-
Breast reconstruction with alloplastic implants.J Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;94(6):471-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20484. J Surg Oncol. 2006. PMID: 17061280 Review.
Cited by
-
Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27182693 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of cognitive behavioral counseling on body Image following mastectomy.J Res Med Sci. 2011 Aug;16(8):1047-54. J Res Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 22279481 Free PMC article.
-
National Trends in Acellular Dermal Matrix Utilization in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jan 1;153(1):25e-36e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010575. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37092982 Free PMC article.
-
Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):416. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1384. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 38213810 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):149-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 26. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016. PMID: 26740288 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical