Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan;42(1):152-9.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ad7f17.

Caloric restriction with or without exercise: the fitness versus fatness debate

D Enette Larson-Meyer  1 , Leanne Redman, Leonie K Heilbronn, Corby K Martin, Eric Ravussin
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Caloric restriction with or without exercise: the fitness versus fatness debate

D Enette Larson-Meyer et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

There is a debate over the independent effects of aerobic fitness and body fatness on mortality and disease risks.

Purpose: To determine whether a 25% energy deficit that produces equal change in body fatness leads to greater cardiometabolic benefits when aerobic exercise is included.

Methods: Thirty-six overweight participants (16 males/20 females) (39 +/- 1 yr; 82 +/- 2 kg; body mass index = 27.8 +/- 0.3 kg x m2, mean +/- SEM) were randomized to one of three groups (n = 12 for each) for a 6-month intervention: control (CO, weight-maintenance diet), caloric restriction (CR, 25% reduction in energy intake), or caloric restriction plus aerobic exercise (CR + EX, 12.5% reduction in energy intake plus 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure). Food was provided during weeks 1-12 and 22-24. Changes in fat mass, visceral fat, VO2peak (graded treadmill test), muscular strength (isokinetic knee extension/flexion), blood lipids, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity/secretion were compared.

Results: As expected, VO2peak was significantly improved after 6 months of intervention in CR + EX only (22 +/- 5% vs 7 +/- 5% in CR and -5 +/- 3% in CO), whereas isokinetic muscular strength did not change. There was no difference in the losses of weight, fat mass, or visceral fat and changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) between the intervention groups. However, only CR + EX had a significant decrease in diastolic BP (-5 +/- 3% vs -2 +/- 2% in CR and -1 +/- 2% in CO), in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-13 +/- 4% vs -6 +/- 3% in CR and 2 +/- 4% in CO), and a significant increase in insulin sensitivity (66 +/- 22% vs 40 +/- 20% in CR and 1 +/- 11% in CO).

Conclusions: Despite similar effect on fat losses, combining CR with exercise increased aerobic fitness in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, LDL cholesterol, and diastolic BP. The results lend support for inclusion of an exercise component in weight loss programs to improve metabolic fitness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of CALERIE Study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in body mass over the 6 months of treatment with control, caloric restriction (CR), and caloric restriction structured aerobic exercise (CR+EX). There were no significant differences between CR and CR+EX treatments. *Significant (p<0.005) change from baseline.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in whole body fat mass and visceral fat stores after 6 months of treatment with control, caloric restriction (CR), and caloric restriction and structured aerobic exercise (CR+EX). There were no significant differences between CR and CR+EX treatments; *Significant (P<0.005) change from baseline.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in cardiometabolic risk factors after 6 months of treatment with control, caloric restriction (CR), and caloric restriction and increased structured exercise (CR+EX). Diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and insulin sensitivity were significantly improved vs. baseline in the CR+EX group but not in the CR or control groups. Systolic blood pressure was not changed by any of the treatments groups whereas HDL was significantly (p<0.05) increased in all treatment groups (including the control),. * Significant (p<0.05) change from baseline.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 373.
    1. Bastard JP, Jardel C, Bruckert E, Blondy P, Capeau J, Laville M, Vidal H, Hainque B. Elevated levels of interleukin 6 are reduced in serum and subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese women after weight loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3338–42. - PubMed
    1. Christou DD, Gentile CL, DeSouza CA, Seals DR, Gates PE. Fatness is a better predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factor profile than aerobic fitness in healthy men. Circulation. 2005;111(15):1904–14. - PubMed
    1. Church TS, Cheng YJ, Earnest CP, Barlow CE, Gibbons LW, Priest EL, Blair SN. Exercise capacity and body composition as predictors of mortality among men with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):83–8. - PubMed
    1. Church TS, LaMonte MJ, Barlow CE, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index as predictors of cardiovascular disease mortality among men with diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(18):2114–20. - PubMed

Publication types