The importance of complete response in outcomes in myeloma
- PMID: 20010165
- DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181c51cd4
The importance of complete response in outcomes in myeloma
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma have dramatically improved during the past 20 years as a result of improved therapeutic options and a better understanding of malignant plasma cell biology. Until the past 10 years, the major limitations on improving outcomes were related to the minimal efficacy of existing agents and balancing the toxicity of therapy in an older patient population. However, despite these limitations, there have been advances that have resulted in improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). High-dose therapy and autologous transplant were the first among therapies to demonstrate an improvement in OS; but more recent analyses have demonstrated that there can be improvement in OS, which is also associated with improvement in the complete response (CR) rate, even among nontransplant patients as well. Thus, achieving CR has been associated with improved OS and has become a therapeutic goal. In the current era of new agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, the fraction of patients who achieve a CR is now greater than before, and the data regarding the importance of achieving this benchmark of response have never been more benefit.
Similar articles
-
"Short course" bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone as induction prior to transplant or as frontline therapy for nontransplant candidates in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan;16(1):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.017. Epub 2009 Sep 3. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010. PMID: 19733251 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term outcomes of previously untreated myeloma patients: responses to induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan incorporated within a risk stratification model can help to direct the use of novel treatments.Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun;129(5):607-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05514.x. Br J Haematol. 2005. PMID: 15916682
-
Treatment of multiple myeloma: an emphasis on new developments.Ann Med. 2006;38(2):111-5. doi: 10.1080/07853890500472078. Ann Med. 2006. PMID: 16581696 Review.
-
Treatment of multiple myeloma: 2009 update.Prescrire Int. 2009 Dec;18(104):263-6. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 20025098
-
Evolving role of novel agents for maintenance therapy in myeloma.Cancer J. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(6):494-501. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181c51f24. Cancer J. 2009. PMID: 20010169 Review.
Cited by
-
Lenalidomide before and after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.Adv Hematol. 2012;2012:712613. doi: 10.1155/2012/712613. Epub 2012 May 30. Adv Hematol. 2012. PMID: 22690220 Free PMC article.
-
Consolidation and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous transplantation: where do we stand?Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;50(8):1024-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.83. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015. PMID: 25893452 Review.
-
Approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma: a clash of philosophies.Blood. 2011 Sep 22;118(12):3205-11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-297853. Epub 2011 Jul 25. Blood. 2011. PMID: 21791430 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous