An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer
- PMID: 20010515
- DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700103
An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: In the current age of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been established as oncologically equivalent to conventional open surgery. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery have translated into smaller incisions and shorter recovery. However, the narrow confines of the bony pelvis and angling limits in current stapling technology, along with the standard practice of autonomic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision, have made laparoscopic surgery in the setting of rectal cancer more challenging. The available literature focusing on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has been predominantly retrospective in nature, with a limited number of prospective studies.
Methods: This article discusses the current status of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. A review of the more recent retrospective and prospective data specifically on laparoscopic resection for mid to low rectal cancer was performed.
Results: The number of prospective randomized trials addressing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection is limited. In the largest trial (MRC CLASICC), an initial increased rate of positive circumferential margins within the laparoscopic anterior resection cohort, although nonsignificant, raised concerns regarding its oncologic adequacy. These concerns did not translate into a difference in local recurrence at 3 years. Improved short-term outcomes, including quicker recovery times, shorter hospital stays, and reduced analgesic requirements (albeit at the price of longer operative times and higher overall cost), have been demonstrated in some studies.
Conclusions: In view of the limited prospective data, laparoscopic resection for mid to low rectal cancer is still investigational in the United States. While feasibility studies are promising, open surgical resection remains the current standard of care. It is hoped that the long-term results of ongoing and newly initiated multi-institutional trials will fully define the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of mid to low rectal cancer.
Similar articles
-
Controversies in laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jan;23(1):35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 23. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014. PMID: 24267164 Review.
-
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013. PMID: 23652740
-
Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: What is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival?World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 7;22(37):8304-8313. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8304. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27729737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3587-3595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6740-y. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30187281
-
Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where do we stand?World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6747-55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6747. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23239912 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Apr;400(3):283-92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1278-y. Epub 2015 Feb 18. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25854502 Review.
-
Outcomes after transanal proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in adolescents.Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jan 25;39(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05381-6. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023. PMID: 36695985
-
Successful total shift from multiport to single-port laparoscopic surgery in low anterior resection of colorectal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2920-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3554-2. Epub 2014 May 23. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24853846
-
Comparing advanced platforms for local excision of rectal lesions.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3976-3983. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10895-8. Epub 2024 May 29. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38811430
-
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;2014(4):CD005200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24737031 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources