Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan 7;463(7277):49-53.
doi: 10.1038/nature08637. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms

Daniela Schiller et al. Nature. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Recent research on changing fears has examined targeting reconsolidation. During reconsolidation, stored information is rendered labile after being retrieved. Pharmacological manipulations at this stage result in an inability to retrieve the memories at later times, suggesting that they are erased or persistently inhibited. Unfortunately, the use of these pharmacological manipulations in humans can be problematic. Here we introduce a non-invasive technique to target the reconsolidation of fear memories in humans. We provide evidence that old fear memories can be updated with non-fearful information provided during the reconsolidation window. As a consequence, fear responses are no longer expressed, an effect that lasted at least a year and was selective only to reactivated memories without affecting others. These findings demonstrate the adaptive role of reconsolidation as a window of opportunity to rewrite emotional memories, and suggest a non-invasive technique that can be used safely in humans to prevent the return of fear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Extinction during reconsolidation prevents spontaneous recovery of extinguished fear
(a) Experimental design and timeline. (b) Mean differential SCRs (CS+ minus CS−) during acquisition (late phase), extinction (last trial) and re-extinction (first trial) for each experimental group (10 min reminder, 6 hr reminder, and no-reminder). The three groups showed equivalent fear acquisition and extinction. Spontaneous recovery (first trial of re-extinction versus the last trial of extinction) was found in the group that had not been reminded or that was reminded 6 hours prior to extinction. In contrast, there was no spontaneous recovery in the group reminded 10 min before extinction. *Significant difference between acquisition and extinction, or extinction and re-extinction within group at p < 0.05; Error bars represent standard errors
Figure 2
Figure 2. Blockade of the return of fear persists one year later
The reinstatement index is the difference in the conditioned fear response (CS+ minus CS−) at the end of re-extinction following the initial spontaneous recovery test and the conditioned fear response immediately after reinstatement a year later. The magnitude of the reinstatement was significantly higher in the 6 hr / no-reminder group compared to the 10 min group, which showed no reinstatement. *Significant difference at p < 0.05; Error bars represent standard errors
Figure 3
Figure 3. Extinction during reconsolidation prevents reinstatement of extinguished fear
(a) Experimental design and timeline. (b) Mean SCRs (CSa+, CSb+, CS−) during acquisition (late phase), extinction (last trial) and re-extinction (first trial). Subjects had equivalent levels of acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear to the two conditioned stimuli. The index of fear recovery was the first trial of re-extinction (following reinstatement) minus the last trial of extinction (before reinstatement). Fear reinstatement was found only to CSb+, (not reminded before extinction training) but not CSa+ (reminded 10 min before extinction training). *Significant difference between acquisition and extinction, or extinction and re-extinction for each stimulus at p < 0.05; Error bars represent standard errors

Comment in

  • Neuroscience: Editing out fear.
    Quirk GJ, Milad MR. Quirk GJ, et al. Nature. 2010 Jan 7;463(7277):36-7. doi: 10.1038/463036a. Nature. 2010. PMID: 20054384 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miracle AD, Brace MF, Huyck KD, Singler SA, Wellman CL. Chronic stress impairs recall of extinction of conditioned fear. Neurobio. Learn. Mem. 2006;85:213–218. - PubMed
    1. Misanin JR, Miller RR, Lewis DJ. Retrograde amnesia produced by electro-convulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace. Science. 1968;160:203–204. - PubMed
    1. Alberini CM. Mechanisms of memory stabilization: are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes? Trends Neuro. 2005;28:51–56. - PubMed
    1. Nader K, Schafe GE, LeDoux JE. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature. 2000;406:722–726. - PubMed
    1. Dudai Y. Reconsolidation: the advantage of being refocused. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006;16:174–178. - PubMed

Publication types