Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;20(3):143-7.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984858.

Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer

Affiliations

Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer

Vincent J Obias et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

A myriad of advances in the treatment of rectal cancer have been achieved over the last few decades. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) has resulted in significant improvements in local recurrence. Surgical education on the technique has made it the standard of care. Radiation and chemotherapy combined with TME have improved results even further with stage II and III cancers. Sphincter-sparing techniques, reservoir procedures, local treatment advances, minimally invasive techniques, surgery for metastatic disease, newer chemotherapies, and extended resections for locally advanced and recurrent lesions, have all benefited the patient with rectal cancer. The goal and responsibility of colorectal surgeons treating rectal cancer patients is to understand and coordinate the wide variety of modalities available to optimize survival, minimize morbidity, and maximize quality of life for those with this difficult problem. Coordination of specialists in this time of evolution in rectal cancer treatment becomes more important than ever. Here the authors briefly review the role of the multidisciplinary team, discuss a model multidisciplinary team approach and look at evidence supporting team use as we begin this issue devoted to the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.

Keywords: Multidisciplinary teams; rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision; tumor board.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birgisson H, Talback M, Gunnarsson U, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Improved survival of cancer of the colon in rectum in Sweden. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(8):845–853. - PubMed
    1. Heald R J, Moran B, Ryall R D, Sexton R, MacFarlane J K. Rectal cancer: The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg. 1998;133:894–899. - PubMed
    1. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, de Velde C J van, Cooperative Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1142–1149. - PubMed
    1. Law W L, Chu K W. Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1607–1612. - PubMed
    1. Martling A L, Holm T, Rutqvist L E, Moran B J, Heald R J, Cedemark B. Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet. 2000;356:93–96. - PubMed