Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug;18(3):141-9.
doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916275.

Colon cancer screening update and management of the malignant polyp

James M Church  1
Affiliations

Colon cancer screening update and management of the malignant polyp

James M Church. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma is common, but screening for this cancer has found less acceptance with the public than screening for breast, prostate, and cervical cancer. Available methods include fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FOS), double-contrast barium enema, colonoscopy, computed tomographic colography, and fecal DNA. Evaluation of these options demonstrates that colonoscopy at ages 55 and 65 offers the best combination of reduction in colorectal cancer at the lowest cost. However, when compliance with screening recommendations is very high, costs are high, and the proportion of cancers arising from adenomas is low, the combination of FOS and FOBT is most cost effective. Malignant polyps look friable and irregular and feel hard. Sessile malignant polyps need to be treated by formal resection. Patients with pedunculated polyps with favorable histology (clear margin, well or moderately differentiated, no lymphovascular invasion) can be observed, and those whose polyps show unfavorable histology should have the polyp-bearing segment of colon resected along with its draining lymph nodes.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy; histology; malignant polyp.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Church J M, Casey G. Molecular Genetics and Colorectal Neoplasia: A Primer for the Clinician. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
    1. Jernal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2005. Ca: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians; 2005. pp. 10–30. - PubMed
    1. Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O'Brien M J, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981. - PubMed
    1. Ries L, Wingo P A, Miller D S, et al. The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2000;88:2398–2424. - PubMed
    1. Cram P, Fendirick A, Inadomi J, Cowen M, Carpenter D, Vijan S. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1601–1605. - PubMed