Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8275.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008275.

Impact of previous virological treatment failures and adherence on the outcome of antiretroviral therapy in 2007

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of previous virological treatment failures and adherence on the outcome of antiretroviral therapy in 2007

Marie Ballif et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) has been very successful, especially among selected patients in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to describe outcomes of cART on the population level in a large national cohort.

Methods: Characteristics of participants of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on stable cART at two semiannual visits in 2007 were analyzed with respect to era of treatment initiation, number of previous virologically failed regimens and self reported adherence. Starting ART in the mono/dual era before HIV-1 RNA assays became available was counted as one failed regimen. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for virological failure between the two consecutive visits.

Results: Of 4541 patients 31.2% and 68.8% had initiated therapy in the mono/dual and cART era, respectively, and been on treatment for a median of 11.7 vs. 5.7 years. At visit 1 in 2007, the mean number of previous failed regimens was 3.2 vs. 0.5 and the viral load was undetectable (<50 copies/ml) in 84.6% vs. 89.1% of the participants, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios of a detectable viral load at visit 2 for participants from the mono/dual era with a history of 2 and 3, 4, >4 previous failures compared to 1 were 0.9 (95% CI 0.4-1.7), 0.8 (0.4-1.6), 1.6 (0.8-3.2), 3.3 (1.7-6.6) respectively, and 2.3 (1.1-4.8) for >2 missed cART doses during the last month, compared to perfect adherence. From the cART era, odds ratios with a history of 1, 2 and >2 previous failures compared to none were 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.5), 2.8 (1.7-4.5) and 7.8 (4.5-13.5), respectively, and 2.8 (1.6-4.8) for >2 missed cART doses during the last month, compared to perfect adherence.

Conclusions: A higher number of previous virologically failed regimens, and imperfect adherence to therapy were independent predictors of imminent virological failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: M.Bal. has no conflicts of interest. B.L. has received travel grants, grants or honoraria from Abbott, Aventis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche and Tibotec. M.Bat. has received research grants or speakers' honoraria from Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, TRB Chemedica, and Tibotec; and serves as a consultant for Boehringer-Ingelheim (Switzerland) and Hoffmann-La Roche (Switzerland). M.C. has received travel grants from Abbott, Gilead, Roche, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. E.B. has received travel grants or honoraria from Gilead, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Tibotec. P.S. has received travel grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Tibotec, Abbott, and Pfizer. B.H. has received travel grants and speakers' honoraria from Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Glaxo, Merck, and Roche. H.F. has participated in advisory boards of GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer-Ingelheim; Janssen. M.R. received travel grants from GlaxoSmithKline. M.O. and R.W. have received travel grants or speakers honoraria from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dome, Pfizer, LaRoche, TRB Chemedica and Tibotec.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The patient disposition for this study is based upon all patients seen in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study during 2007.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of viral loads and CD4 cell counts at first follow-up visit in 2007 (visit 1) according to the number of previous virologically failed regimens.
The upper panels show HIV-1 RNA counts for patients who started therapy in the mono/dual era (A) and in the cART era (B). Lower panels show CD4 cell counts for patients from the mono/dual era (C) and for patients from the cART era (D), respectively. By definition all patients from the mono/dual era failed at least one regimen.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Virological course between the first follow-up visit in 2007 (visit 1) and the next semi-annual follow-up cohort visit (visit 2).
Viral loads patterns are shown in the upper panels: (A) patients from the mono/dual ART era; (B) patients from the cART era.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Factors associated with HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/ml at visit 2.
Odds ratios from uni- and multivariable logistic regressions are shown with 95% confidence intervals. Panel A includes patients who initiated ART the mono/dual era, and panel B those who initiated ART in the cART era. Multivariable models were also adjusted for age, sex, transmission risk group, HCV co-infection, total duration of ART therapy, maximum viral load ever and CD4 cell count at the first visit in 2007 (all p-values >0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) study group. Response to combination antiretroviral therapy: variation by age. AIDS. 2008;22:1463–1473. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JA, Chen SS, Quinn JB. Comparative efficacy of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in combination with efavirenz: results of a systematic overview. HIV Clin Trials. 2007;8:221–226. - PubMed
    1. Eron J,, Jr., Yeni P, Gathe J,, Jr., Estrada V, DeJesus E, et al. The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006;368:476–482. - PubMed
    1. Riddler SA, Haubrich R, DiRienzo AG, Peeples L, Powderly WG, et al. Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2095–2106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper D, Gatell J, Rockstroh J, Katlama C, Yeni P, et al. 48-week results from BENCHMRK-1, a phase III study of raltegravir in patients failing ART with triple-class resistant HIV-1. 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, February 3–6, Boston Ma, Abstract #. 2008;788

Publication types