Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;37(5):417-26.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0257-4.

Staff turnover in statewide implementation of ACT: relationship with ACT fidelity and other team characteristics

Affiliations

Staff turnover in statewide implementation of ACT: relationship with ACT fidelity and other team characteristics

Angela L Rollins et al. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Staff turnover on assertive community treatment (ACT) teams is a poorly understood phenomenon. This study examined annual turnover and fidelity data collected in a statewide implementation of ACT over a 5-year period. Mean annual staff turnover across all observations was 30.0%. Turnover was negatively correlated with overall fidelity at Year 1 and 3. The team approach fidelity item was negatively correlated with staff turnover at Year 3. For 13 teams with 3 years of follow-up data, turnover rates did not change over time. Most ACT staff turnover rates were comparable or better than other turnover rates reported in the mental health and substance abuse literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. ACT staff turnover by follow-up year for cohorts 1-4
Cohort is defined by when the baseline assessment was completed. Cohort 1: early 2002; Cohort 2: Fall 2002; Cohort 3: late 2003 and early 2004; Cohort 4: late 2004 and 2005. Note: The arrows show the approximate time that Medicaid per diem began for each cohort. The change in admission criteria happened approximately one year later.
Figure 2
Figure 2. ACT staff turnover rates by calendar year for cohorts 1-4
Cohort is defined by when the baseline assessment was completed. Cohort 1: early 2002; Cohort 2: Fall 2002; Cohort 3: late 2003 and early 2004; Cohort 4: late 2004 and 2005. The first vertical line indicates the start of special Medicaid per diem funding for ACT (October 2004) and the second indicates a policy change of more stringent admission criteria (October, 2005).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allness DJ, Knoedler WH. The PACT model of community-based treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illness: A manual for PACT start-up. Arlington, VA: NAMI; 2003.
    1. Allred CA, Burns BJ, Phillips SD. The assertive community treatment team as a complex dynamic system of care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2005;32(3):211–220. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Dror R. Employee turnover in community mental health organization: A developmental stages study. Community Mental Health Journal. 1994;30(3):243–257. - PubMed
    1. Blankertz LE, Robinson SE. Turnover intentions of community mental health workers in psychosocial rehabilitation services. Community Mental Health Journal. 1997;33(6):517–529. - PubMed
    1. Bond GR. Variations in an assertive outreach model. New Directions for Mental Health Services. 1991;52:65–80. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources